Effects of Dual Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation for Aphasia in Chronic Stroke Patients.
10.5535/arm.2013.37.5.603
- Author:
Seung Yeol LEE
1
;
Hee Jung CHEON
;
Kyoung Jae YOON
;
Won Hyuk CHANG
;
Yun Hee KIM
Author Information
1. Department of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, Stroke and Cerebrovascular Center, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Korea. yunkim@skku.edu
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
Stroke;
Aphasia;
Transcranial direct current stimulation;
Electrical stimulation therapy
- MeSH:
Aphasia*;
Electric Stimulation Therapy;
Electrodes;
Humans;
Muscles;
Reaction Time;
Speech Therapy;
Stroke*
- From:Annals of Rehabilitation Medicine
2013;37(5):603-610
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
-
Abstract:
OBJECTIVE: To investigate any additional effect of dual transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) compared with single tDCS in chronic stroke patients with aphasia. METHODS: Eleven chronic stroke patients (aged 52.6+/-13.4 years, nine men) with aphasia were enrolled. Single anodal tDCS was applied over the left inferior frontal gyrus (IFG) and a cathodal electrode was placed over the left buccinator muscle. Dual tDCS was applied as follows: 1) anodal tDCS over the left IFG and cathodal tDCS over the left buccinator muscle and 2) cathodal tDCS over the right IFG and anodal tDCS over the right buccinator muscle. Each tDCS was delivered for 30 minutes at a 2-mA intensity. Speech therapy was provided during the last 15 minutes of the tDCS. Before and after the stimulation, the Korean-Boston Naming Test and a verbal fluency test were performed. RESULTS: The dual tDCS produced a significant improvement in the response time for the Korean-Boston Naming Test compared with the baseline assessment, with a significant interaction between the time and type of interventions. Both single and dual tDCS produced a significant improvement in the number of correct responses after stimulation with no significant interaction. No significant changes in the verbal fluency test were observed after single or dual tDCS. CONCLUSION: The results conveyed that dual tDCS using anodal tDCS over the left IFG and cathodal tDCS over the right IFG may be more effective than a single anodal tDCS over the left IFG.
