In vitro Antimicrobial Synergy against Imipenem-Resistant Acinetobacter baumannii.
10.3343/kjlm.2007.27.2.111
- Author:
Heungsup SUNG
1
;
Soo Jin CHOI
;
Soojin YOO
;
Mi Na KIM
Author Information
1. Department of Laboratory Medicine, University of Ulsan College of Medicine and Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea. mnkim@amc.seoul.kr
- Publication Type:Original Article ; English Abstract
- Keywords:
Imipenem-resistant;
Acinetobacter baumannii;
Atimicrobial synergy;
Double disk synergy;
Time kill study
- MeSH:
Acinetobacter baumannii/*drug effects/isolation & purification;
Anti-Bacterial Agents/*pharmacology;
Drug Resistance, Bacterial;
Drug Synergism;
Humans;
Imipenem/*pharmacology;
Microbial Sensitivity Tests;
Time Factors
- From:The Korean Journal of Laboratory Medicine
2007;27(2):111-117
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:Korean
-
Abstract:
BACKGROUND: Most imipenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (IRAB) isolates are multiresistant, leaving few options for an effective antimicrobial therapy. We purposed to select possible candidates for the combinations of antimicrobials that are synergistic in vitro for inhibitory or bactericidal activities against IRAB and evaluate the usefulness of double disk synergy test (DDS) in predicting synergistic bactericidal activity. METHODS: Fifty-five IRAB isolates recovered from patients during the period from August 1999 to November 2000 were tested for susceptibilities to amikacin, gentamicin, tobramycin, piperacillin, piperacillin/tazobactam, cefotaxime, cefepime, cefoperazone/sulbactam (C/S), imipenem, meropenem, ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin, trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole, chloramphenicol, minocycline, and colistin by the Clinical and Laboratory Standard Institute agar dilution method. Three isolates showing different susceptibility profiles were tested for antimicrobial synergy by DDS and then by timekill study (TKS) using DDS-positive combinations. RESULTS: Colistin, C/S, and minocycline were active in 50 (90.9%), 50, and 44 (80.0%) isolates, respectively, and all the other drugs were active in less than 20% of isolates. Minocycline-imipenem, minocycline-C/S, minocycline-amikacin, imipenem-tobramycin, C/S-amikacin, and C/S-tobramycin combinations showed synergistic inhibitory or bactericidal activity by TKS when the same combinations were synergistic in DDS; however, C/S-imipenem was found synergistic on DDS, but not by TKS. CONCLUSIONS: Colistin, C/S, and minocycline were relatively active against IRAB. DDS might help predict the synergistic antimicrobial effect of TKS if one of the combinations was susceptible.
