A Study on Bioethical Consideration to Prospective Clinical Research Papers published in Journal of Korean Society of Emergency Medicine.
- Author:
Sung Su LEE
1
;
Ha Young PARK
;
Ik Joon JO
;
Yeon Kwon JEONG
;
Byung Seop SHIN
;
Byung In CHOE
;
Hyoung Gon SONG
Author Information
1. Department of Emergency Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. cprking@skku.edu
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
Bioethics;
Informed consent;
Emergency medicine;
IRB;
Helsinki Declaration
- MeSH:
Bioethics;
Checklist;
Conflict of Interest;
Discrimination (Psychology);
Emergencies;
Emergency Medicine;
Ethical Review;
Ethics Committees, Research;
Helsinki Declaration;
Humans;
Informed Consent;
Patient Rights;
Privacy;
Research Subjects
- From:Journal of the Korean Society of Emergency Medicine
2009;20(1):134-137
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:Korean
-
Abstract:
PURPOSE: There is increasing concern about ethical conduct of human research in the field of medicine. The purpose of this study was to assess the ethical review process by institutional review boards for human research articles published in the journal of Korean Society of Emergency Medicine. METHODS: We reviewed human research papers published in the journal of Korean Society of Emergency Medicine from the 1st edition, 1990 to the 6th edition, 2006. A checklist was used to review the articles. RESULTS: The total number of prospective clinical research paper was 250. Among them, there were 63 papers (25.2%) in which the obtaining of informed consent was described in the article. Only two studies (0.8%) published in the journal were noted to have IRB approval. Invasive techniques were employed in 134 studies (53.6%). Among the 134, only 22 (16.4%) mentioned that informed consent taken was given during the study. Studies which may have involved discrimination totaled 21 (8.4%), and the number of studies that may have violated the patients' right to privacy was 20 (8%). The number of studies that may have a conflict of interest but was not declared was 12 (4.8%). CONCLUSION: There should be greater concern about the ethical conduct of research in studies with human research subjects in the journal of the Korean Society of Emergency Medicine.
