Prognostic Inflammation Score in Surgical Patients with Colorectal Cancer.
10.3346/jkms.2015.30.12.1793
- Author:
Moo Kyung SEONG
1
Author Information
1. Department of Surgery, Konkuk University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. recto@kuh.ac.kr
- Publication Type:Original Article ; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
- Keywords:
Colorectal Neoplasms;
Inflammation;
C-reactive Protein, Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate;
White Blood Cell Count;
Neutrophi/Lymphocyte Ratio
- MeSH:
Adult;
Aged;
Aged, 80 and over;
Blood Sedimentation;
C-Reactive Protein/metabolism;
Colorectal Neoplasms/*blood/*surgery;
Female;
Humans;
Inflammation/*blood;
Inflammation Mediators/blood;
Leukocyte Count;
Lymphocyte Count;
Male;
Middle Aged;
Neutrophils;
Prognosis;
Retrospective Studies
- From:Journal of Korean Medical Science
2015;30(12):1793-1799
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
-
Abstract:
Several inflammatory markers have been investigated as prognostic parameters in a variety of cancer population with mostly favorable results. This study aimed to verify the significance of common inflammatory markers as prognostic variables and assess whether a selective combination of them as prognostic inflammation score (PIS) could further improve their prognostic values in surgical patients with colorectal cancer (CRC). A total of 265 patients who had undergone curative resection of CRC were reviewed retrospectively. Preoperative levels of inflammatory markers such as serum C-reactive protein (CRP), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), white blood cell count (WBC), and neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (NLR) were assessed by uni- and multivariate survival analysis with disease-free (DFS) and disease-specific survival (DSS). PIS was constructed with a selective combination of inflammatory markers which were independently significant. On univariate analysis, CRP, ESR, and NLR were significantly associated with DFS and DSS. On multivariate analysis, CRP and NLR were independently significant prognostic variables for DSS and DFS respectively (P=0.013, P=0.021). When PIS was constructed with combination of CRP and NLR, it was independently and significantly associated with both DFS and DSS (P=0.006, P=0.010). Furthermore, PIS was superior to CRP for DSS (HR=15.679 vs. HR=5.183), and NLR for DFS in terms of prognosticating power (HR=4.894 vs. HR=2.687). When PIS is constructed with combination of CRP and NLR, it is a potentially significant prognostic variable associated with poor survival regardless pathologic prognostic variables in patients with CRC after curative resection.
