Dose Verification Study of Brachytherapy Plans Using Monte Carlo Methods and CT Images.
- Author:
Kwang Ho CHEONG
1
;
Me Yeon LEE
;
Sei Kwon KANG
;
Hoonsik BAE
;
Soah PARK
;
Kyoung Joo KIM
;
Tae Jin HWANG
;
Do Hoon OH
Author Information
1. Department of Radiation Oncology, Hallym University College of Medicine, Anyang, Korea. khcheong@hallym.or.kr
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
Monte Carlo;
DOSXYZnrc;
AAPM TG-43;
Brachytherapy;
(192)Ir
- MeSH:
Accounting;
Brachytherapy;
Film Dosimetry;
Humans;
Monte Carlo Method;
Organoplatinum Compounds;
Population Characteristics;
Uterine Cervical Neoplasms;
Water
- From:Korean Journal of Medical Physics
2010;21(3):253-260
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
-
Abstract:
Most brachytherapy treatment planning systems employ a dosimetry formalism based on the AAPM TG-43 report which does not appropriately consider tissue heterogeneity. In this study we aimed to set up a simple Monte Carlo-based intracavitary high-dose-rate brachytherapy (IC-HDRB) plan verification platform, focusing particularly on the robustness of the direct Monte Carlo dose calculation using material and density information derived from CT images. CT images of slab phantoms and a uterine cervical cancer patient were used for brachytherapy plans based on the Plato (Nucletron, Netherlands) brachytherapy planning system. Monte Carlo simulations were implemented using the parameters from the Plato system and compared with the EBT film dosimetry and conventional dose computations. EGSnrc based DOSXYZnrc code was used for Monte Carlo simulations. Each (192)Ir source of the afterloader was approximately modeled as a parallel-piped shape inside the converted CT data set whose voxel size was 2x2x2 mm3. Bracytherapy dose calculations based on the TG-43 showed good agreement with the Monte Carlo results in a homogeneous media whose density was close to water, but there were significant errors in high-density materials. For a patient case, A and B point dose differences were less than 3%, while the mean dose discrepancy was as much as 5%. Conventional dose computation methods might underdose the targets by not accounting for the effects of high-density materials. The proposed platform was shown to be feasible and to have good dose calculation accuracy. One should be careful when confirming the plan using a conventional brachytherapy dose computation method, and moreover, an independent dose verification system as developed in this study might be helpful.
