Risk Acceptance and Expectations of Scalp Allotransplantation.
10.7181/acfs.2016.17.2.68
- Author:
Jun Ho CHOI
1
;
Kwang Seog KIM
;
Jun Ho SHIN
;
Jae Ha HWANG
;
Sam Yong LEE
Author Information
1. Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Chonnam National University Medical School, Gwangju, Korea. pskim@chonnam.ac.kr
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
Scalp;
Vascularized composite allotransplantation;
Surveys and questionnaires;
Reconstructive surgical procedures;
Patient acceptance of health care
- MeSH:
Hair;
Humans;
Immunosuppression;
Kidney Transplantation;
Patient Acceptance of Health Care;
Reconstructive Surgical Procedures;
Scalp*;
Surveys and Questionnaires;
Tissue Donors;
Transplants;
Vascularized Composite Allotransplantation
- From:Archives of Craniofacial Surgery
2016;17(2):68-76
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
-
Abstract:
BACKGROUND: In scalp allotransplantation, the scalp from a brain-dead donor, including hair, is transferred to a recipient with scalp defects. Opinions differ on the appropriateness of scalp allotransplantation. In order to maintain graft function and cosmetic outcomes, scalp transplantation recipients would need to receive lifelong immunosuppression treatments. The risks of this immunosuppression have to be balanced against the fact that receiving a scalp allotransplant does not extend lifespan or restore a physical function. Therefore, the present study aimed to investigate risk acceptance and expectations regarding scalp allotransplantation in different populations. METHODS: A questionnaire survey study was conducted. A total of 300 subjects participated; survey was conducted amongst the general public (n=100), kidney transplantation recipients (n=50), a group of patient who required scalp reconstruction due to tumor or trauma (n=50), and physicians (n=100). The survey was modified by using the Korean version of the Louisville instrument for transplantation questionnaire. RESULTS: Risk acceptance and expectations for scalp transplantation varied widely across the groups. Kidney transplantation recipients revealed the highest risk acceptance and expectations, whereas the physicians were most resistant to the risks of scalp transplantation. CONCLUSION: Our study demonstrates that, in specific groups, scalp allotransplantation and the need for immunosuppression carries an acceptable risk despite the lack of lifeextending benefits. Our results suggest that scalp allotransplantation can be an acceptable alternative to existing scalp reconstruction surgeries in patients with pre-existing need for immunosuppression.
