Clinical Considerations When Applying Vital Signs in Pediatric Korean Triage and Acuity Scale.
10.3346/jkms.2017.32.10.1702
- Author:
Bongjin LEE
1
;
Do Kyun KIM
;
June Dong PARK
;
Young Ho KWAK
Author Information
1. Department of Emergency Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea. yhkwak@snuh.org
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
Children;
Emergency Department;
Triage;
Pediatric Korean Triage and Acuity Scale
- MeSH:
Anxiety;
Child;
Emergency Service, Hospital;
Hospitalization;
Humans;
Intensive Care Units;
Triage*;
Vital Signs*
- From:Journal of Korean Medical Science
2017;32(10):1702-1707
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
-
Abstract:
Initial vital signs of children at the emergency department may be abnormal because of anxiety and irritability, resulting in unrealistic triage levels. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of pediatric triage by clinical decision based on the patient's general condition. The Pediatric Korean Triage and Acuity Scale (PedKTAS) has been used nationwide for triage since 2016. The triage level, as assessed by an experienced triage nurse and based on the patient's clinical condition, was defined as the ‘real practice (RP)-level,’ while the re-calculated triage level, as assessed by the direct application of initial vital signs, was defined as the ‘simulation (S)-level.’ A total of 22,841 patients were triaged during the study period. The hospitalization rate according to RP-PedKTAS levels exhibited a significant correlation with the expected hospitalization rate suggested by the Pediatric Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale (CTAS) (P = 0.002), whereas the S-PedKTAS levels did not (P = 0.151). Compared with the previously reported pediatric CTAS level-specific hospitalization rate and intensive care unit (ICU) admission rate, RP-PedKTAS was significantly correlated with both hospitalization rate and ICU admission rate (P = 0.001 and P = 0.012, respectively). However, S-PedKTAS showed no significant correlation in both (P = 0.267 and P = 0.188, respectively). The determination of triage levels based on clinical decision rather than the direct application of abnormal initial vital signs to PedKTAS is more accurate in predicting the hospitalization rate and ICU admission rate.