A comparison of the precision of three-dimensional images acquired by 2 digital intraoral scanners: effects of tooth irregularity and scanning direction.
- Author:
Ji Won ANH
1
;
Ji Man PARK
;
Youn Sic CHUN
;
Miae KIM
;
Minji KIM
Author Information
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords: Three-dimensional scanner; Digital models; Dental cast analysis; Three-dimensional diagnosis and treatment planning
- MeSH: Dental Arch; Imaging, Three-Dimensional*; Tooth*
- From:The Korean Journal of Orthodontics 2016;46(1):3-12
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
- Abstract: OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare the precision of three-dimensional (3D) images acquired using iTero(R) (Align Technology Inc., San Jose, CA, USA) and Trios(R) (3Shape Dental Systems, Copenhagen, Denmark) digital intraoral scanners, and to evaluate the effects of the severity of tooth irregularities and scanning sequence on precision. METHODS: Dental arch models were fabricated with differing degrees of tooth irregularity and divided into 2 groups based on scanning sequence. To assess their precision, images were superimposed and an optimized superimposition algorithm was employed to measure any 3D deviation. The t-test, paired t-test, and one-way ANOVA were performed (p < 0.05) for statistical analysis. RESULTS: The iTero(R) and Trios(R) systems showed no statistically significant difference in precision among models with differing degrees of tooth irregularity. However, there were statistically significant differences in the precision of the 2 scanners when the starting points of scanning were different. The iTero(R) scanner (mean deviation, 29.84 +/- 12.08 microm) proved to be less precise than the Trios(R) scanner (22.17 +/- 4.47 microm). CONCLUSIONS: The precision of 3D images differed according to the degree of tooth irregularity, scanning sequence, and scanner type. However, from a clinical standpoint, both scanners were highly accurate regardless of the degree of tooth irregularity.
