A Retrospective Clinical Epidemiological Study of the Health Care Utilization of the Outpatients in the Dermatologic Field after 1 year's Separation of Dispensary from Medical Practice.
- Author:
Jae Wang KIM
1
;
Il Hwan LEE
;
Soon Taek KIM
;
Choong Chul KIM
;
Dong Hoon SONG
;
Kyung Jin KIM
;
Inn Ki CHUN
;
Jun Hyeob KIM
;
Joon Seong YANG
;
Min Soo LEE
;
Si Won LEE
;
Sang Seok KIM
;
Kwang Joong KIM
;
Chong Ju LEE
Author Information
1. Department of Dermatology, College of Medicine, Jeju National University, Jeju, Korea. rulidroxim@hanmail.net
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
Health care utilization;
Separation of dispensary from medical practice
- MeSH:
Delivery of Health Care*;
Epidemiologic Studies*;
Financing, Organized;
Humans;
Korea;
Medical Records;
Medicine, Traditional;
Outpatients*;
Pharmacists;
Pharmacy;
Prescriptions;
Primary Health Care;
Retrospective Studies*;
Skin Diseases;
Surveys and Questionnaires
- From:Korean Journal of Dermatology
2003;41(6):740-753
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:Korean
-
Abstract:
BACKGROUND: Despite 2 years' separation of dispensary from medical practice since year of 2000, many outpatients in Korea have a lack of understanding this separation. In addition, the illegal practices of pharmacists such as medical examination have contributed to the recent problematic situation. OBJECTIVE: We performed this study to evaluate the actual situation of the separation of dispensary from medical practice in the dermatologic field. METHODS: The clinico-epidemiologic analysis of 17 months' data of 18, 230 outpatients was conducted through the available medical records and serial questionnaires. RESULTS: The medical or non-medical institutions that 18, 230 outpatients with skin diseases had chosen at first, were as follows by the order of frequency; pharmacy(78.5%), folk remedies or self-medication(9.8%), dermatologic institutions(5.5%), non-dermatologic medical clinics(3.4%), herb clinics(2.8%). Accordingly, most(94.5%, 17, 223) of the new patients did not select a dermatologic institution for the care of their skin diseases. The patterns of health care utilization of the patients mostly(72.9%) showed a fixed tendency to visit the one particular institution or formula continuously prior to final visit to the research hospitals. Most of the patients(62.8%) firstly visited a pharmacy for their disease care and did not revisit another institution. Since the first visit to a pharmacy, 9.6% of the patients repetitively utilized one or more herb clinic(s) or folk remedies in addition to one or more medical institution(s). The patients utilizing non-dermatologic measures for skin disease care at first, were mostly in their fifties(25.3%). The patients seeking herb medicine or non-dermatologic medical clinics, were in their teens(27.3% and 24.3%, respectively). Of the cases misdiagnosed as another disease or aggravated in the patients choosing non-dermatologic care, fungal infections are most common(24.0%). In front of 97.1% of the patients seeking pharmacy at first, the pharmacists practiced medicine like a physician in a wrong way instead of dispensing a prescription. CONCLUSION: In Korea, the majority of dermatologic clinics has been deprived of a position as an institution for primary care of skin diseases. It is imperative that dermatologists should be granted independent and unconstrained authority in the medical profession for the benefit of their patients.
