Change in Guardians' Favor in Computed Tomography after Explained by Emergency Physicians in Pediatric Head Injury.
- Author:
Jin Hee JEONG
1
;
Jin Hee LEE
;
Kyuseok KIM
;
Joong Eui RHEE
;
Tae Yun KIM
;
You Hwan JO
;
Yu Jin KIM
;
Jae Hyuk LEE
;
Changwoo KANG
;
Soo Hoon LEE
;
Joonghee KIM
;
Chan Jong PARK
;
Hyuksool KWON
Author Information
1. Department of Emergency Medicine, Gyeongsang National University School of Medicine, Jinju-si, Gyeongsangnam-do, Republic of Korea.
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
Head injury;
Close;
Pediatrics;
Tomography;
X-ray computed
- MeSH:
Child;
Craniocerebral Trauma*;
Emergencies*;
Emergency Service, Hospital;
Glasgow Coma Scale;
Head*;
Humans;
Pediatrics;
Risk Assessment;
Visual Analog Scale
- From:Journal of the Korean Society of Emergency Medicine
2016;27(2):189-198
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
-
Abstract:
PURPOSE: Head injury in children is a common problem presenting to emergency departments, and cranial computed tomography scan is the diagnostic standard for these patients. Several decision rules are used to determine whether computed tomography scans should be used; however, the use of computed tomography scans is often influenced by guardian favor toward the scans. The objective of this study was to identify changes in guardian favor for explanation of minor head injuries based on the institutional clinical practice guidelines. METHODS: A survey was conducted between July 2010 and June 2012. Patients younger than 16 years with a Glasgow Coma Scale score of 15 after a head injury and guardians of these patients were included. Pre- and post-explanation questionnaires were administered to guardians to evaluate their favor for computed tomography scans and factors related to the degree of favor. Treating physicians explained the risks and benefits of cranial computed tomography scans using the institutional clinical practice guidelines. Guardian favor for a computed tomography (CT) scan was examined using a 100-mm visual analog scale. RESULTS: A total of 208 patients and their guardians were included in this survey. Guardian favor for computed tomography scans was significantly reduced after explanation (46.7 vs. 17.4, p<0.01). Pre-explanation favor and the degree of physician recommending computed tomography were the most important factors affecting pre- and postexplanation changes in favor. CONCLUSION: Explanation of the risks and benefits of cranial computed tomography scans using the institutional clinical practice guidelines may significantly reduce guardian favor for computed tomography scans.
