Treatment concepts for the posterior maxilla and mandible: short implants versus long implants in augmented bone.
- Author:
Daniel Stefan THOMA
1
;
Jae Kook CHA
;
Ui Won JUNG
Author Information
- Publication Type:Review
- Keywords: Alveolar ridge augmentation; Dental implants; Sinus floor augmentation
- MeSH: Alveolar Ridge Augmentation; Bone Substitutes; Dental Implants; Humans; Mandible*; Maxilla*; Sinus Floor Augmentation; Survival Rate
- From:Journal of Periodontal & Implant Science 2017;47(1):2-12
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
- Abstract: The aim of this narrative review is to describe treatment options for the posterior regions of the mandible and the maxilla, comparing short implants vs. longer implants in an augmented bone. The dental literature was screened for treatment options enabling the placement of dental implants in posterior sites with a reduced vertical bone height in the maxilla and the mandible. Short dental implants have been increasingly used recently, providing a number of advantages including reduced patient morbidity, shorter treatment time, and lower costs. In the posterior maxilla, sinus elevation procedures were for long considered to be the gold standard using various bone substitute materials and rendering high implant survival rates. More recently, implants were even placed without any further use of bone substitute materials, but the long-term outcomes have yet to be documented. Vertical bone augmentation procedures in the mandible require a relatively high level of surgical skill and allow the placement of standard-length dental implants by the use of autogenous bone blocks. Both treatment options, short dental implants, and standard-length implants in combination with vertical bone augmentation procedures, appear to result in predictable outcomes in terms of implant survival rates. According to recent clinical studies comparing the therapeutic options of short implants vs. long implants in augmented bone, the use of short dental implants leads to a number of advantages for the patients and the clinician.
