Comparison of morbidity-related seroma formation following conventional latissimus dorsi flap versus muscle-sparing latissimus dorsi flap breast reconstruction.
10.4174/astr.2017.93.3.119
- Author:
Yoshihiro SOWA
1
;
Toshiaki NUMAJIRI
;
Katsuhiko NAKATSUKASA
;
Koichi SAKAGUCHI
;
Tetsuya TAGUCHI
Author Information
1. Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyoto, Japan. sowawan@kpu-m.ac.jp
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
Superficial back muscles;
Mammaplasty;
Seroma
- MeSH:
Breast*;
Drainage;
Female;
Humans;
Length of Stay;
Mammaplasty*;
Mastectomy, Segmental;
Mastectomy, Simple;
Medical Records;
Seroma*;
Superficial Back Muscles*;
Tissue Donors
- From:Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research
2017;93(3):119-124
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
-
Abstract:
PURPOSE: The pedicled, descending-branch muscle-sparing latissimus dorsi (MSLD) flap has been widely used for breast reconstruction following total mastectomy. However, the superiority of the MSLD flap compared to the conventional latissimus dorsi (CLD) flap in preventing seroma formation has not been demonstrated. This study compares the morbidities related to seroma formation following pedicled MSLD flap and CLD flap breast reconstruction. METHODS: A total of 15 women who underwent partial mastectomy and immediate partial breast reconstruction with MSLD flaps were compared with 15 women under identical conditions with CLD flap breast reconstruction. The medical records were reviewed for both complications and demographic data. The authors compared morbidity, including donor-site seroma, total volume of drain discharge, indwelling period of drainage, and length of hospital stay following both MSLD flap and CLD flap breast reconstruction. RESULTS: The demographic data of the 2 groups were not significantly different. Donor-site seroma occurred in 2 MSLD patients (13.3%) and in 6 CLD patients (40.0%). The total volume of the drain discharge and the indwelling period of drainage at donor site were significantly lower in the MSLD group. The length of hospital stay was significantly shorter (by approximately a day and a half) for the MSLD group. CONCLUSION: The MSLD flap, with its low complication rate and associated minimal functional and aesthetic deficits at the donor site, may be a useful option for small breast reconstruction if earlier discharge from hospital is demanded.
