Gastric Stromal Tumor: Two-Phase Dynamic CT Findings with Water as Oral Contrast Agents.
10.3348/jkrs.2000.42.1.121
- Author:
Se Hyo LEE
1
;
June Sik CHO
;
Kyung Sook SHIN
;
Ki Ho JEONG
;
Jin Yong PARK
;
Ho Jun YU
;
Young Min KIM
;
Kwang Jin JEONG
Author Information
1. Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Chungnam National University College of Medicine, Korea.
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
Stomach, neoplasms;
Stomach, CT
- MeSH:
Contrast Media*;
Diagnosis;
Humans;
Lymph Nodes;
Mucous Membrane;
Necrosis;
Neoplasm Metastasis;
Retrospective Studies;
Tomography, X-Ray Computed;
Ulcer;
Water*
- From:Journal of the Korean Radiological Society
2000;42(1):121-128
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:Korean
-
Abstract:
PURPOSE: To evaluate two-phase dynamic CT with water as oral contrast agents in the CT diagnosis of gastric stromal tumors. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the CT findings in 21 patients with pathologically proven gastric stromal tumors. Six were found to be benign, twelve were malignant, and there were three cases of STUMP (stromal tumor uncertain malignant potential). Two-phase dynamic CT scans with water as oral contrast agents were obtained 60-70secs (portal phase) and 3 mins (equilibrium phase) after the start of IV contrast administration. We determined the size, growth pattern, and enhancement pattern of the tumors and overlying mucosa, the presence or absence of ulceration and necrosis, tumor extent, and lymph node and distant metastasis. The CT and pathologic findings were correlated. RESULTS: All six benign tumors and three STUMP were less than 5.5 cm in size, and during the portal phase showed round endogastric masses with highly enhanced, intact overlying mucosa. Twelve malignant tumors were 4.5-15.5 cm in size (mean, 11.5cm); an endogastric mass was seen in three cases, an exogastric mass in one, and a mixed pattern in eight. On portal phase images the tumors were not significantly enhanced, but highly enhanced feeding vessels were noted in five larger tumors (> 10 cm). All 12 malignant tumors showed ulceration and necrosis, and interruption of overlying mucosa was clearly seen during the portal phase. We were readily able to evaluate tumor extent during this phase, and in ten malignant tumors there was no invasion of adjacent organs. Seven malignant tumors showed air density within their necrotic portion (p<0.05). On equilibrium phase images, all malignant tumors showed heterogeneous enhancement due to necrosis, and poorly enhanced overlying mucosa. CONCLUSION: Dynamic CT during the portal phase with water as oral contrast agents was useful for depicting the submucosal origin of gastric stromal tumors and for evaluating the extent of malignant stromal tumors. Our results suggest that these CT findings may be helpful for differentiating between benign and malignant stromal tumors, and in distinguishing them from other gastric tumors.
