- Author:
Ji Young KWON
1
;
In Yang PARK
Author Information
- Publication Type:Randomized Controlled Trial ; Review
- Keywords: Cardiotocography; Electrocardiography; Fetal heart rate; Monitoring; Perinatal mortality
- MeSH: Cardiotocography; Electrocardiography; Female; Fetal Heart*; Fetus; Heart Rate; Heart Rate, Fetal*; Mass Screening; Perinatal Mortality; Pregnancy
- From:Obstetrics & Gynecology Science 2016;59(2):79-84
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
- Abstract: The monitoring of fetal heart rate (FHR) status is an important method to check well-being of the baby during labor. Since the electronic FHR monitoring was introduced 40 years ago, it has been expected to be an innovative screening test to detect fetuses who are becoming hypoxic and who may benefit from cesarean delivery or operative vaginal delivery. However, several randomized controlled trials have failed to prove that electronic FHR monitoring had any benefit of reducing the perinatal mortality and morbidity. Also it is now clear that the FHR monitoring had high intra- and interobserver disagreements and increased the rate of cesarean delivery. Despite such limitations, the FHR monitoring is still one of the most important obstetric procedures in clinical practice, and the cardiotocogram is the most-used equipment. To supplement cardiotocogram, new methods of computerized FHR analysis and electrocardiogram have been developed, and several clinical researches have been currently performed. Computerized equipment makes us to analyze beat-to-beat variability and short term heart rate patterns. Furthermore, researches about multiparameters of FHR variability will be ongoing.