Comparison of Reconstructive Techniques after Total Gastrectomy as Determined by Patient Quality of Life and Nutritional Status.
10.5230/jkgca.2007.7.4.219
- Author:
Kyeong Soo SEO
1
;
Jong Myeong LEE
;
Woo Yeong KIM
Author Information
1. Department of Surgery, Jeon-ju Presbyterian Hospital, Jeonju, Korea. gslee52@hananet.net
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
Total gastrectomy;
Nutrition;
Quality of life;
Jejunal pouch interposition
- MeSH:
Body Weight;
Eating;
Endoscopy;
Esophagitis, Peptic;
Gastrectomy*;
Humans;
Nutritional Status*;
Quality of Life*;
Recurrence;
Serum Albumin
- From:Journal of the Korean Gastric Cancer Association
2007;7(4):219-227
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:Korean
-
Abstract:
PURPOSE: Many reconstruction procedures have been developed in order to resolve patient complaints after a total gastrectomy. However, until now, there has been no general agreement with regard to the ideal reconstruction to perform after a total gastrectomy. Moreover, there have been few reports of the long-term effects of different reconstruction procedures. In this study, we compared the long-term nutritional status and quality of life for patients that received either a Roux-en-Y esophagojejunostomy (R-Y), jejunal interposition (JI), jejunal pouch interposition (JPI), or double tract reconstruction (DT), to determine the optimum reconstruction procedure after a total gastrectomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study consisted of 41 patients younger than 80 years who had undergone a total gastrectomy with curative resection and who had no evidence of recurrence at our hospital between August 2000 and January 2004. The patients were classified into the following four groups, according to the type of reconstruction; simple Roux-en-Y (R-Y group, n=15), jejunal interposition (JI; group, n=8), j Jejunal pouch interposition (JPI group, n=8), double tract interposition (DT group, n=10). The nutritional status was assessed by measuring body weight, serum albumin level, serum hemoglobin level, and the level of serum total protein, and the PNI (Prognostic nutritional index). Quality of life was assessed by GSRS. In addition, endoscopy was performed to confirm the presence of reflux esophagitis. RESULTS: The laboratory findings showed no significant differences between the four groups except for a lower total protein and album level in the DT group after 3 years postoperatively (P=0.006, P=0.033). The percentage of body weight at 1 year, and 3 years postoperatively in the JI group (P=0.013, P=0.011) were significantly less than other groups (P=0.011, P=0.000). The frequency of postoperative symptoms and reflux esophagitis and eating capacity showed no significant differences between the four groups. The GSRS score in the JIP group was significantly better than for the other groups at 1 year, and 3 years postoperatively (P=0.028, P=0.003). CONCLUSION: We believe that the jejunal pouch interposition is the most useful of the four procedures for improving postoperative quality of life.
