EFFECT OF DFDB AND GTAM BARRIERS ON BONE REGENERATION AROUND IMMEDIATE IMPLANTS PLACED IN SURGICALLY DFFECTIVE SOCKET.
- Author:
Hyeong Soo KIM
1
;
Hong So YANG
Author Information
1. Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, Chonnam National University, Korea.
- Publication Type:Original Article
- MeSH:
Animals;
Bone Density;
Bone Regeneration*;
Bone Remodeling;
Dental Implants;
Dogs;
Fluorescent Dyes;
Osseointegration;
Osteogenesis;
Regeneration;
Titanium;
Torque
- From:The Journal of Korean Academy of Prosthodontics
1997;35(1):43-66
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:Korean
-
Abstract:
Dental implant may be immediately placed in postextraction socket which has alveolar bone defect. The purpose of this study was to compare the bone regeneration and bone quality around defects adjacent to implants that were placed into extraction sockets according to EFEB, GTAM barrier and GTAM barrier with DFDB. Mandibular P2, P3 and P4 were extracted bilaterally in dogs, and buccal defects were created about 4mm in depth and 3.3mm in width. Screwed pure titanium implants, 3.8mm in diameter and 10mm in length, were placed into the extraction sockets. The experimental groups were divided into four groups : the G group was covered with a GTAM barrier on the defective area, the D+G group was filled with DFEB and covered with a GTAM barrier, the D group was filled with DFDB only and the control group was sutured without any special treatment on the defective area. The experimental animals were killed after 12 weeks and specimens were prepared for light microscopic evaluation and fluorescent dyes were administered daily for 2 weeks after implantation, and injected on the 4th and 11th week for fluorescent microscopic examination to observe new bone formation and bone remodeling. The new Bone height of the buccal defect was measured and compared with the another for bone gain and the removal torque for the implant was measured for the comparison of bone density and bone-implant osseointegration. Results obtained were as follows : 1. Experimental groups showed bone regeneration in oder from D+G, G, D group and control. D+G and G group was significantly from D group and control(P<0.01). 2. In the defective area of control the regenerated alveolar bone showed poorly developed lamellated structure and fibrous tissue intervention into the bone-implant interface but the others showed well developed lamellated structure and osseointegration. 3. All implant groups showed no significant difference in the removal torque for implant(P>0.05) These results suggest that immediate implants placed in defective sockets were successfully osseointegrated and utilizing placed in defective sockets were successfully osseointegrated and utilizing not only the combination of GTAM and DFDB but also only the GTAM was favorable for the predictable regeneration of the defective area.
