The Effect of General Anesthesia on Hemodynamics during Laparoscopic Hysterectomy.
10.4097/kjae.1999.36.5.828
- Author:
Sung Won CHUNG
1
;
Hyun Woo DO
;
Ae Ra KIM
;
Jae Kyu JEON
Author Information
1. Department of Anesthesiology, Keimyung University School of Medicine, Taegu, Korea.
- Publication Type:Original Article ; Randomized Controlled Trial
- Keywords:
Anesthetics, propofol, enflurane;
Heart, hemodynamics;
Surgery, laparoscopy, obstetric
- MeSH:
Anesthesia;
Anesthesia, General*;
Anesthesia, Intravenous;
Arterial Pressure;
Blood Pressure;
Carbon Dioxide;
Enflurane;
Female;
Heart Rate;
Hemodynamics*;
Humans;
Hysterectomy*;
Insufflation;
Laparoscopy;
Pneumoperitoneum;
Propofol;
Stroke
- From:Korean Journal of Anesthesiology
1999;36(5):828-833
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:Korean
-
Abstract:
BACKGROUND: Laparoscopy with peritoneal carbon dioxide insufflation is a standard procedure in many gynecological departments. And more prolonged gynecological laparoscopic operations are being performed in recent years, and a steeper head-down position is required. Despite laparoscopic operations have many advantages, peritoneal insufflation of CO2 to create the pneumoperitoneum necessary for laparoscopy induces intraoperative hemodynamic changes that complicate anesthetic management of laparoscopy.The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effect of general anesthesia on hemodynamics during loparoscopic hysterectomy. METHODS: Twenty six women undergoing laparoscopic hysterectomy were randomly allocated to either a propofol (Group 1, n=13) intravenous anesthesia or a enflurane (Group 2, n=13) anesthesia with fentanyl-N2O/O2-vecuronium. Hemodynamic parameters were measured before induction (T1), 5 min after induction (T2), 5 min after head-down (T3), 5, 10, 15, 20 min after pneumoperitoneum (T4, T5, T6, T7), 5, 10 min after deflation (T8, T9). The MAP, HR, CI, SVRI, SI were measured by transthoracic electrical bioimpedence method and automated blood pressure device. RESULTS: The mean arterial pressure were increased during pneumoperitonem in both groups and heart rate were increased in Group 2. The cardic index were decreased in both groups after induction by 27.4 % in Group 1 and 25.7% in Group 2. The systemic vascular resistanace index were increased in both groups from head-down to after deflation by 68.3% in Group 1, 73.1% in Group 2 maximally. No significant changes of stroke index were observed during surgery in Group 1. CONCLUSIONS: Laproscopy with CO2 insufflation induces significant hemodynamic changes includig increases of MAP, SVR and a reduction of CI. And usual intraoperative hemodynamic monitoring; the blood pressure and heart rate give no information on the reduction in cardic output.
