Minimally Invasive Cardiac Surgery: Three different approaches.
- Author:
Seung Hyuck CHUNG
1
;
Jee Hyuck YANG
;
Hye Won NAM
;
Ki Bong KIM
;
Hyuk AN
Author Information
1. Department Thoracic & Cardiovascular Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine.
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
Minimally invasive surgery
- MeSH:
Atrial Fibrillation;
Hemorrhage;
Humans;
Intensive Care Units;
Length of Stay;
Mortality;
Pain, Postoperative;
Postoperative Complications;
Rehabilitation;
Reoperation;
Skin;
Sternotomy;
Surgical Procedures, Minimally Invasive;
Thoracic Surgery*;
Thorax;
Wounds and Injuries
- From:The Korean Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
1999;32(5):438-441
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:Korean
-
Abstract:
BACKGROUND: Minimally invasive cardiac surgery has emerged as a new approach to the conventional median sternotomy. The suggested advantages of the minimally invasive technique includes improved cosmesis, simplicity of opening and closing the chest, less postoperative pain, less risk of infection and bleeding, early rehabilitation, and reduced length of hospital stay. MATERIAL AND METHOD: Between March 1997 and December 1997, we performed 36 cases of minimally invasive cardiac surgery via three different approaches ; right paramedian, transverse sternotomy and mini-sternotomy with upper sternal split. RESULT: There was no operative mortality. Postoperative complications were atrial fibrillation in 4 patients, bleeding that required reoperation in 1 patient, and delayed wound closure in 1 patient who underwent 3rd redo operation. Average length of skin incision was 9.1+/-0.9 cm. Average duration of stay in the intensive care unit was 48+/-29 hours and the patients were discharged 10+/-7 days after the operation. CONCLUSION: In spite of the difficulties in defibrillation, deairing, and cardiac decompensation, minimally invasive approaches will be applied increasingly because of the suggested advantages.
