Clinical Feasibility of Video-assisted Thoracic Surgery for Thoracic Trauma.
- Author:
Do Kyun KANG
1
;
Hyeong Ryul KIM
;
Yong Hee KIM
;
Dong Kwan KIM
;
Seung Il PARK
Author Information
1. Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan, College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. hrkim09@amc.seoul.kr
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
Video-assisted thoracic surgery;
Thorax;
Trauma
- MeSH:
Female;
Hematoma;
Hemorrhage;
Hemothorax;
Humans;
Male;
Medical Records;
Multiple Organ Failure;
Retrospective Studies;
Thoracic Surgery;
Thoracic Surgery, Video-Assisted;
Thoracotomy;
Thorax;
Vital Signs
- From:Journal of the Korean Society of Traumatology
2010;23(2):170-174
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:Korean
-
Abstract:
PURPOSE: As techniques and instruments for video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) have been evolving, attempts to perform VATS for chest trauma have been increasing. Several studies have demonstrated the feasibility and safety of VATS for thoracic trauma. We reviewed our experience to evaluate the clinical feasibility and safety of VATS for thoracic trauma. METHODS: Fifty-two patients underwent thoracic surgery for chest trauma in Asan Medical Center from January 1990 to December 2009. VATS was performed in 21 patients who showed stable vital signs. We reviewed retrospectively the medical records of those patients to investigate the results of VATS for thoracic trauma. RESULTS: Thoracic exploration for chest trauma was performed in 52 patients. There were 46 males (88.5%) and 6 females (11.5%). The median age was 46.0 years (range: 11~81 years). There were 39 blunt and 13 penetrating traumas. A standard posterolateral thoracotomy was performed in 31 patients, and VATS was tried in 21 patients. We performed successful VATS in 13 patients; 11 males (84.5%) and 2 females (15.5%) with a median age of 46.0 years (range: 24~75 years). The indication of VATS was persistent intrathoracic hemorrhage in 10 patients and clotted hemothorax in 3 patients. There were no complications, but there were two mortalities due to multiple organ failure after massive transfusion. In 8 patients, VATS was converted to a standard posterolateral thoracotomy for several reasons. The reason was inadequate visualization for bleeding control or evacuation of the hematoma in 5 patients. In 3 patients, VATS was performed to evaluate diaphragmatic injury. After the diaphragmatic injury had been confirmed, a standard posterolateral thoracotomy was performed to repair the diaphragm. CONCLUSION: VATS should be safe and efficient method for diagnostic evaluation and surgical management of stable patients with thoracic trauma.
