Development of a Critical Pathway for Patients with Lumbar Laminectomy.
- Author:
Jae Jung PARK
1
;
Hyoung Sook PARK
Author Information
1. College of Nursing. Pusan National University, Korea.
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
Case management;
Critical pathway;
Lumbar Laminectomy
- MeSH:
Arm;
Axis, Cervical Vertebra;
Busan;
Case Management;
Critical Pathways*;
Diet;
Hospitalization;
Humans;
Hypesthesia;
Laminectomy*;
Leg;
Low Back Pain;
Medical Records;
Neurosurgery;
Patient Discharge
- From:Journal of Korean Academy of Adult Nursing
2000;12(4):517-532
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:Korean
-
Abstract:
The purpose of this study was to develop a critical pathway for case management of patients who have received Lumbar Laminectomy because of low back pain, arm and leg numbness, and radiating pain in the leg. For this study, a preliminary critical pathway was developed through a review of the literature including five critical pathways which are currently being used in the USA. In order to identify the overall service contents required by these patients, 30 cases were analyzed. These cases were taken from medical records of those with Lumbar Laminectomy between January, 1998 and December, 1998 in the department of neurosurgery at the Pusan National University Hospital in Pusan. An expert validity test was done for the preliminary critical pathway, a clinical validity test was also done using 12 patients with Lumbar Laminectomy between October 1, 1999 and January 31, 2000. After these processes, the final critical pathway was developed. The results are summarized as follows. 1. The vertical axis of the critical pathway includes the following eight items: assessment, consultation, diet, test, medication, treatment, activity, education/ discharge planning. The horizontal axis includes the time from the start of hospitalization to discharge. Analysis of the 30 medical records was done. analysis of the service contents showed the horizontal axis of the preliminary critical pathway was set from hospitalization to the 12th post operation day and the vertical axis was set to include eight items, the contents which should have occurred, according to the time frames of the horizontal axis. 2. As a result of the expert validity test, it was found that among the 233 items, 203 showed over 88% agreement and 30 of them showed less than 88% agreement, which were then revised or deleted from the critical pathway. At the preliminary meeting for the clinical validity test, the time of hospitalization on the horizontal axis was shortened to the 10th post operation day. A clinical validity test was done with 12 patients with Lumbar Laminectomy. All the cases progressed according to the critical pathway although some variances were noted in assessment, consultation, test, medication, and treatment. 3. Based on these results, a final critical pathway was determined. In conclusion, this critical pathway is partially applicable to the care of patients with Lumbar Laminectomy and needs further investigation.
