Efficacy of Protocol-based Erythropoietin Administration in Chronic Hemodialysis Patients.
- Author:
Young Sook HUR
1
;
Jeong Yup KIM
;
Jin Ho SHIN
;
Young Joo KWON
;
Heui Jung PYO
Author Information
1. Hemodialysis Unit, Guro Hospital, College of Medicine, Korea University, Seoul, Korea.
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
Anemia;
Hemodialysis;
Erythropoietin;
Protocol
- MeSH:
Anemia;
Arterial Pressure;
Creatinine;
Erythropoietin*;
Ferritins;
Hematocrit;
Humans;
Hypertension;
Iron;
Kidney Failure, Chronic;
Mortality;
Parathyroid Hormone;
Prealbumin;
Renal Dialysis*;
Transferrin
- From:Korean Journal of Nephrology
2004;23(4):593-602
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:Korean
-
Abstract:
BACKGROUND: Anemia is a major contributor to morbidity and mortality in chronic renal failure patients. The benefits of anemia correction using recombinant human erythropoietin (Epo) are well established but because of high cost, several studies increasing the efficacy of it were described. The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of an anemia management protocol using subcutaneous Epo and intravenous iron therapy. METHODS: We enrolled seventy-eight maintenance hemodialysis patients for at least 3 months from January 2000 to November 2002. They received a practice of anemia correction in two other settings. One (control) group performed an irregular administration of Epo and iron, the other (protocol) group performed a regular administration according to anemia management protocol. Clinical and laboratory parameters were analyzed. Dosage of Epo and IV iron were compared. RESULTS: Thirty-one patients in control group and forty-seven patients in protocol group were enrolled. There were no significant differences between two groups in age, gender, existence of diabetic mellitus, vintage of hemodialysis, use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor, BUN, prealbumin, parathyroid hormone and Kt/Vurea. Mean arterial pressure, creatinine and albumin were significantly lower and hematocrit was significantly higher and well-maintained on the target level in protocol group. There were no significant differences in serum iron, transferrin saturation, ferritin but total iron binding capacity was significantly lower in protocol group. Doses of erythropoietin and IV iron showed no significant differences between two groups. CONCLUSION: The protocol based erythropoietin administration was more efficient in achieving target hematocrit without increment of dosage of erythropoietin and intravenous iron and side effect of hypertension.
