Efficacy of a 3-Dimension HMD (Head Mounted Displayer) for Audiovisual Sexual Stimulation after Oral Phosphodiesterase Type 5 (PDE 5) Inhibitor Medication for the Diagnosis of Vasculogenic Erectile Dysfunction.
- Author:
Un Gi BAEK
1
;
Ki Hak MOON
Author Information
1. Department of Urology, College of Medicine, Yeungnam University, Daegu, Korea. khmoon@med.yu.ac.kr
- Publication Type:Original Article ; Randomized Controlled Trial
- Keywords:
Erectile dysfunction;
Vardenafil;
Visual stimulation
- MeSH:
Diagnosis*;
Erectile Dysfunction*;
Genetic Complementation Test;
Humans;
Male;
Photic Stimulation;
Sensitivity and Specificity;
Vardenafil Dihydrochloride
- From:Korean Journal of Urology
2005;46(12):1302-1307
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:Korean
-
Abstract:
PURPOSE: The AVSS with 3-D HMD is considered to provide a more realistic image and more comfortable circumstances in which the subjects are absorbed in the stimulation. We investigated the efficacy of using 3-D combined with oral medication and a stimulation (COS) test for the evaluation of vasculogenic erectile dysfunction (ED). MATERIALS AND METHODS: 66 patients with complaints of ED, 28 patients diagnosed with vasculogenic ED and 38 patients diagnosed with psychogenic ED were included in this study. The patients were randomly divided into the 2-D group and the 3-D group. The 2-D group patients were examined with using 2-D combined an injection and a stimulation (CIS) test. The 3-D group patients were examined with 3-D CIS test. Then a week later, the patients underwent the AVSS with 3-D HMD 1 hour after oral PDE 5 inhibitor medication. The degree of erection was monitored using the Nocturnal Electrobioimpedance Volumetric Assessment (NEVA) system. RESULTS: On the 2-D CIS tests, 12 of 27 patients showed normal erection, and this resulted in a sensitivity and specificity of 72.7% and 56.3%, respectively. On the 3-D CIS tests, 20 of 39 patients showed normal erection and on the 3-D COS tests, 17 patients showed normal erection and this resulted in a sensitivity and specificity of 88.2% and 81.8%, and 94.1% and 72.7%, respectively. No significant difference were present in the results of the diagnosis between the 3-D CIS and 3-D COS tests. CONCLUSIONS: Both the 3-D CIS and 3-D COS tests offer the advantage of higher sensitivity and specificity than the conventional CIS test. The 3-D COS test may be used as a substitute for the conventional CIS test due to its simplicity and less invasive nature.
