Clinical Usefulness of Schedule for Oral-Motor Assessment (SOMA) in Children with Dysphagia.
10.5535/arm.2011.35.4.477
- Author:
Moon Ju KO
1
;
Min Jae KANG
;
Kil Jun KO
;
Young Ok KI
;
Hyun Jung CHANG
;
Jeong Yi KWON
Author Information
1. Department of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul 135-710, Korea. jeongyi.kwon@samsung.com
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
Dysphagia;
Oral-motor dysfunction;
Schedule for Oral-Motor Assessment (SOMA);
Videofluoroscopic swallowing study (VFSS)
- MeSH:
Appointments and Schedules;
Carisoprodol;
Child;
Crying;
Deglutition;
Deglutition Disorders;
Humans;
Sensitivity and Specificity
- From:Annals of Rehabilitation Medicine
2011;35(4):477-484
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
-
Abstract:
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the clinical usefulness of the Schedule for Oral-Motor Assessment (SOMA) in children with dysphagia by comparing findings of SOMA with those of the videofluoroscopic swallowing study (VFSS). METHOD: Both SOMA and VFSS were performed in 33 children with dysphagia (21 boys and 12 girls; mean age 17.3+/-12.1 months) who were referred for oropharyngeal evaluation. Ratings of oral-motor functions indicated by SOMA were based upon the cutting score of each specific texture of food (puree, semi-solids, solids, cracker, liquid-bottle, and liquid-cup). Abnormalities of either the oral phase, or the pharyngeal phase as indicated by VFSS were assessed by a physician and a speech-language pathologist. RESULTS: There was significant consistency between the findings of SOMA and the oral phase evaluation by VFSS (Kappa=0.419, p=0.023). SOMA reached 87.5% sensitivity, 66.6% specificity, and 95.4% positive predictive value when compared with the oral phase of the VFSS. We were able to evaluate oral-motor function by using SOMA in 6 children who were unable to complete the oral phase evaluation by VFSS, due to fear and crying during the study. The findings of SOMA failed to show any consistency with the pharyngeal phase evaluation by VFSS (Kappa=-0.105, p=0.509). CONCLUSION: These results suggest that SOMA is a reliable method for evaluation of oral-motor function in children with dysphagia. In particular, SOMA is recommended for children that were unable to complete the oral phase evaluation by VFSS due to poor cooperation.
