Functional Electrical Stimulation to Ankle Dorsiflexor and Plantarflexor Using Single Foot Switch in Patients With Hemiplegia From Hemorrhagic Stroke.
10.5535/arm.2014.38.3.310
- Author:
Young Hee LEE
1
;
Sang Yeol YONG
;
Sung Hoon KIM
;
Ji Hyun KIM
;
Jong Mock SHINN
;
Youngho KIM
;
Seunghyeon KIM
;
Seonhong HWANG
Author Information
1. Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Wonju Severance Christian Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Wonju, Korea. enmcse@hanmail.net
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
Electrical stimulation;
Hemiplegia;
Gait;
Kinematics
- MeSH:
Ankle*;
Biomechanical Phenomena;
Electric Stimulation*;
Foot*;
Gait;
Gait Disorders, Neurologic;
Hemiplegia*;
Humans;
Knee;
Stroke*
- From:Annals of Rehabilitation Medicine
2014;38(3):310-316
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
-
Abstract:
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effects of functional electrical stimulation (FES) to ankle dorsiflexor (DF) and ankle plantarflexor (PF) on kinematic and kinetic parameters of hemiplegic gait. METHODS: Fourteen post-stroke hemiplegic patients were considered in this study. Electrical stimulation was delivered to ankle DF during the swing phase and ankle PF during the stance phase via single foot switch. Kinematic and kinetic data were collected using a computerized motion analysis system with force plate. Data of no stimulation (NS), DF stimulation only (DS), DF and PF stimulation (DPS) group were compared among each other. RESULTS: Peak ankle dorsiflexion angle during swing phase is significantly greater in DS group (-1.55degrees+/-9.10degrees) and DPS group (-2.23degrees+/-9.64degrees), compared with NS group (-6.71degrees+/-11.73degrees) (p<0.05), although there was no statistically significant difference between DS and DPS groups. Ankle plantarflexion angle at toe-off did not show significant differences among NS, DS, and DPS groups. Peak knee flexion in DPS group (34.12degrees+/-13.77degrees) during swing phase was significantly greater than that of NS group (30.78degrees+/-13.64degrees), or DS group (32.83degrees+/-13.07degrees) (p<0.05). CONCLUSION: In addition to the usual FES application stimulating ankle DF during the swing phase, stimulation of ankle PF during stance phase can help to increase peak knee flexion during the swing phase. This study shows the advantages of stimulating the ankle DF and PF using single foot switch for post-stroke gait.
