Comparison of the Uniaxial Tensile Strength, Elasticity and Thermal Stability between Glutaraldehyde and Glutaraldehyde with Solvent Fixation in Xenograft Cardiovascular Tissue.
- Author:
Sungkyu CHO
1
;
Yong Jin KIM
;
Soo Hwan KIM
;
Ji Eun PARK
;
Woong Han KIM
Author Information
1. Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Hospital Clinical Research Institute, Xenotransplantation Research Center, Korea. kyj@plaza.snu.ac.kr
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
Xenograft;
Glutaraldehyde;
Bioprosthesis
- MeSH:
Bioprosthesis;
Elasticity;
Ethanol;
Glutaral;
Hand;
Motor Activity;
Palpation;
Pericardium;
Prostheses and Implants;
Pulmonary Valve;
Solvents;
Sutures;
Tensile Strength;
Thoracic Surgery;
Transplantation, Heterologous
- From:The Korean Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
2009;42(2):165-
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:Korean
-
Abstract:
BACKGROUND: With the advances of cardiac surgery, the demand for an artificial prosthesis has increased, and this has led to the development and utilization of diverse alternative materials. We conducted this research to improve an artificial prosthesis by examining the changes of the physical qualities, the pressure related tensile strength, the change in elasticity and the thermostability of a xenograft valve (porcine) and pericardium (bovine, porcine) based on the type of fixation liquid we used. MATERIAL AND METHOD: The xenograft valves and pericardium were assigned into three groups: the untreated group, the fixed with glutaraldehyde (GA) group and the glutaraldehyde with GA+solvent such as ethanol etc. group. The surgeons carried out each group's physical activities. Each group's uniaxial tension and elasticity was measured and compared. Thermostability testing was conducted and compared between the bovine and porcine pericardium fixed with GA group and the GA+solvent group. RESULT: On the physical activity test in the surgeon's hand, no significant difference between the groups was sensed on palpation. For suture and tension, the GA+solvent group was slightly firmer than the low GA concentration group. In general, the circumferential uniaxial tension and elasticity of the porcine aortic and pulmonary valves were better in the fixed groups than that in the untreated group. There was no significant difference between the GA and GA+solvent groups (p>0.05). Bovine and porcine pericardium also showed no significant difference between the GA group and the GA+solvent group (p>0.05). When comparing between the groups for each experiment, the elasticity tended to be stronger in most of the higher GA concentration group (porcine pulmonary valve, porcine pericardium). On the thermostability testing of the bovine and porcine pericardium, the GA group and the GA+solvent group both had a sudden shrinking point at 80degrees C that showed no difference (bovine pericardium: p=0.057, porcine pericardium: p=0.227). CONCLUSION: When fixing xenograft prosthetic devices with GA, adding a solvent did not cause a loss in pressure-tension, tension-elasticity and thermostability. In addition, more functional solvents or cleansers should be developed for developing better xenografts.
