Multiple Spine Fractures of Young Adult (Over 3 Vertebrae).
10.4184/jkss.2005.12.3.206
- Author:
Ho Guen CHANG
1
;
Young Woo KIM
;
Yong Chan KIM
;
Duck Joo KWON
;
Kyu Nam SEO
;
Kee Byong LEE
Author Information
1. Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Hallym University Sacred Heart Hospital, College of Medicine, Hallym University Seoul, Korea. oskdj@hallym.or.kr
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
Multiple spine fracture;
Bone scan;
CT;
MRI
- MeSH:
Accidents, Traffic;
Back Pain;
Humans;
Magnetic Resonance Imaging;
Retrospective Studies;
Spinal Injuries;
Spine*;
Young Adult*
- From:Journal of Korean Society of Spine Surgery
2005;12(3):206-213
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:Korean
-
Abstract:
STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective study. OBJECTIVES: To analyze the mode of injury, associated lesions, time of injury, and the checking times of MRI/CT and Bone scans in multiple spine fractures SUMMARY OF LITERATURE REVIEW: CT was predominantly used to discover and identify the fracture levels of the spine. However, fracture level identification in the entire spine was limited. CT, MRI and Bone scans were used for diagnosing multiple spine fractures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between 1999 and 2004, 12 patients who had more than level 3 spine fractures were studied. The mode of injury, associated lesions, time of injury, and checking times of MRI/CT and Bone scans were analyzed. RESULTS: The causes of the spinal injuries were from a fall from height, from traffic accidents and from multi-complex forced trauma in 7, 4 and 1 cases, respectively. Most cases had no severe associated lesions. The accuracy of the plain roentgenograms was 26% and that of CT was 35.3%, and the average checking time was 1.5 days. The accuracy of MRI was 100% and the average checking time was 4.3 days. The accuracy of the bone scans was 100%, and the average checking time was 11.7 days. The fracture patterns consisted of 37, 7, 3 and 3 non-compression (74%), compression (14%), burst (6%) and fracture-dislocation types (6%), respectively. The major treatment methods used with these patients were conservative. The treatment methods in 4 cases were with the use posterior instrumentation. CONCLUSIONS: MRI produced more accurate and faster results than the other methods of detection. The accuracy of the plain roentgenograms was 26%, which was relatively inaccurate. Therefore, if the patient complains of multiple back pains, the surgeon must check other diagnostic tools.
