Implementation of the Medical Research Curriculum in Graduate Medical School.
- Author:
Kwi Hwa PARK
1
;
Tae Hee KIM
;
Wook Jin CHUNG
Author Information
1. Department of Medical Education, Gachon University of Medicine and Science School of Medicine, Incheon, Korea. heart@gilhospital.com
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
Graduate medical education;
Medical students;
Biomedical research;
Curriculum;
Self efficacy
- MeSH:
Curriculum;
Education, Medical, Graduate;
Equipment and Supplies;
Ethics, Research;
Humans;
Male;
Research Design;
Schools, Medical;
Self Efficacy;
Statistics as Topic;
Students, Medical;
Writing
- From:Korean Journal of Medical Education
2011;23(2):103-110
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:Korean
-
Abstract:
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to analyze the effect of the medical research curriculum on the students' satisfaction and the research self-efficacy. METHODS: The curriculum was implemented to 79 graduate medical school students who entered in 2007 and 2008. This curriculum is implemented through 3 years consisting of 5 different sub-courses: Research design, Research ethics, Medical statistics, Writing medical paper, and Presentation. The effect of this program was measured with 2 self-administered surveys to students: the course satisfaction survey and the self-efficacy inventories. The Research Self-Efficacy Scale consisted of 18 items from 4 categories: Research design, Research ethics, Data analysis, and Result presentation. The descriptive statistics, paired t-test, and analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) were implemented. RESULTS: The average point of satisfaction of the course was 2.74 out of 4, which told us that students generally satisfied with the course. The frequencies of tutoring for research course were 2 or 3 times on average and each session of tutorial lasted 1.5 to 2 hours. The research self-efficacy in three categories (Research design, Research ethics, and Result presentation) increased significantly (p<0.1). The self-efficacy of the male students was higher than females' one. The self-efficacy was not significantly different by the experience of research paper writing at undergraduate level. CONCLUSION: The curriculum showed positive results in cultivating research self-efficacy of students. There is a need for improvement of the class of Statistical analysis as students reported that it was difficult.
