Anastomotic Leakage after Laparoscopic versus Open Resection for Rectal Cancer: A Retrospective Study.
10.3393/jksc.2007.23.5.350
- Author:
Doo Seok LEE
1
;
Eui Gon YOUK
;
Sung Il CHOI
;
Doo Han LEE
;
Do Sun KIM
;
Hong Young MOON
Author Information
1. Department of Surgery, Daehang Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
Anastomotic leakage;
Laparoscopic resection;
Rectal cancer;
Linear staple
- MeSH:
Anastomotic Leak*;
Humans;
Rectal Neoplasms*;
Retrospective Studies*
- From:Journal of the Korean Society of Coloproctology
2007;23(5):350-357
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:Korean
-
Abstract:
PURPOSE: This study is to compare the rate and pattern of anastomotic leakage (AL) for rectal cancer after laparoscopic vs. conventional open surgery at high and low rectal anastomosis and to evaluate whether the number of linear staples used for distal rectal resection is related to AL in laparoscopic group. RESULTS: One hundred ninety-seven patients who underwent a curative resection for rectal cancer between March 2002 and February 2006 were studied retrospectively (107 laparoscopic, 90 open). The proportions of patients with anastomosis above vs. below 5 cm from AV were not different between the laparoscopic and the open groups; (above/below: 54/53 and 41/49, respectively, P=0.57). The protective stoma rate, the overall rate of AL, the rate of AL according to the height of the anastomosis, and the number of distal linear staples were evaluated for both groups. RESULTS: Clinical AL occurred in 11 of 107 patients (10.3%) for the laparoscopic group and in 5 of 90 patients (5.6%) for the open group. The rates of AL in patients without protective stoma were not significantly different for high rectal anastomosis (6.0% for laparoscopic vs. 2.6% for open, P= 0.63) and for low rectal anastomosis (25.8% for laparoscopic vs. 12.1% for open, P=0.21). The risk of AL was 4.9 times higher when 3 linear staples were used than when 2 linear staples were used in the laparoscopic group. CONCLUSIONS: There was no statistical difference in AL between the laparoscopic group and the open group. The rate of AL could be reduced by using fewer linear staples for distal rectal resection in the laparoscopic group.
