Factors Influencing Nonabsolute Indications for Surgery in Patients With Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms Suggestive of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: Analysis Using Causal Bayesian Networks.
10.5213/inj.2014.18.4.198
- Author:
Myong KIM
1
;
Luis RAMIREZ
;
Changwon YOO
;
Minsoo CHOO
;
Jae Seung PAICK
;
Seung June OH
Author Information
1. Department of Urology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea. sjo@snu.ac.kr
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
Bayes Theorem;
Decision Support Techniques;
Decision Making, Computer-Assisted;
Prostatic Hyperplasia;
Urodynamics
- MeSH:
Bayes Theorem;
Decision Making, Computer-Assisted;
Decision Support Techniques;
Humans;
Linear Models;
Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms*;
Prostate;
Prostatic Hyperplasia*;
ROC Curve;
Urinary Bladder Neck Obstruction;
Urodynamics
- From:International Neurourology Journal
2014;18(4):198-205
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
-
Abstract:
PURPOSE: To identify the factors affecting the surgical decisions of experienced physicians when treating patients with lower urinary tract symptoms that are suggestive of benign prostatic hyperplasia (LUTS/BPH). METHODS: Patients with LUTS/BPH treated by two physicians between October 2004 and August 2013 were included in this study. The causal Bayesian network (CBN) model was used to analyze factors influencing the surgical decisions of physicians and the actual performance of surgery. The accuracies of the established CBN models were verified using linear regression (LR) analysis. RESULTS: A total of 1,108 patients with LUTS/BPH were analyzed. The mean age and total prostate volume (TPV) were 66.2 (+/-7.3, standard deviation) years and 47.3 (+/-25.4) mL, respectively. Of the total 1,108 patients, 603 (54.4%) were treated by physician A and 505 (45.6%) were treated by physician B. Although surgery was recommended to 699 patients (63.1%), 589 (53.2%) actually underwent surgery. Our CBN model showed that the TPV (R=0.432), treating physician (R=0.370), bladder outlet obstruction (BOO) on urodynamic study (UDS) (R=0.324), and International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) question 3 (intermittency; R=0.141) were the factors directly influencing the surgical decision. The transition zone volume (R=0.396), treating physician (R=0.340), and BOO (R=0.300) directly affected the performance of surgery. Compared to the LR model, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of the CBN surgical decision model was slightly compromised (0.803 vs. 0.847, P<0.001), whereas that of the actual performance of surgery model was similar (0.801 vs. 0.820, P=0.063) to the LR model. CONCLUSIONS: The TPV, treating physician, BOO on UDS, and the IPSS item of intermittency were factors that directly influenced decision-making in physicians treating patients with LUTS/BPH.