Posterolateral Thoracotomy versus Muscle-sparing Vertical Thoracotomy.
- Author:
Kwang Ho KIM
1
;
Hyun Tae KIM
;
Jung Taek KIM
;
Kyung SUN
Author Information
1. Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Inha University Medical College, Korea.
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
Thoracotomy
- MeSH:
Chest Tubes;
Drainage;
Humans;
Incidence;
Lung;
Muscles;
Postoperative Complications;
Postoperative Period;
Retrospective Studies;
Shoulder;
Thoracic Wall;
Thoracotomy*;
Thorax;
Wounds and Injuries
- From:The Korean Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
1998;31(5):509-512
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:Korean
-
Abstract:
Although posterolateral thoracotomy (PLT) has been a standard thoracic incision in resection surgery of the lung for surgeons to achieve a good surgical field, there remains concern about severing a group of thoracic muscles remains. Muscle-sparing vertical thoracotomy (MVT) is an alternative to PLT, which gives cosmetic result and may preserve motion of the shoulder girdle as well as respiratory function of the patient in the early postoperative period. However, surgeons tend not to perfer it because of limited surgical field from the vertical wound made on the lateral thoracic wall. The purpose of this study is to compare the surgical outcomes of PLT versus MVT. We retrospectively reviewed 29 patients (15 who had PLT and 14 who had MVT, organized into those two groups) who had undergone lung resection surgery in our institute. There were no clinical differences between the two groups in terms of operation time, estimated amount of blood loss during the operation, amount of chest drainage on the first and the second postoperative day, duration of chest tube placement, incidence and amount of transfusion, and postoperative complications. We conclude that, from our limited experience, MVT can be applied to lung resection surgery as safely as PLT and that it may have a beneficial role for the patient with compromised lung function in addition to cosmetic effect.
