Clinical Study of Open Nasal Bone Fracture.
- Author:
Chan Hum PARK
1
;
Duk Young KIM
;
Taek Gun KWAN
;
Sung Ju HONG
;
Ki Nam JUNG
Author Information
1. Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, College of Medicine, Hallym University, Chuncheon, Korea. hlpch@lycos.co.kr
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
Open;
Nasal bone;
Fractures
- MeSH:
Humans;
Nasal Bone*;
Nose;
Skin;
Wounds and Injuries
- From:Journal of Rhinology
2005;12(2):108-111
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:Korean
-
Abstract:
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Little is known about the treatment of open nasal bone fracture (ONF). The operative technique, timing, and management of ONF is still confusing. This study presents our treatment policy of ONF to help otolaryngologists decide proper management plan. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Of 380 consecutive patients who required surgical intervention, 57 patients underwent open nasal reduction. Of 57 patients, 15 had one-stage operation, and 42 had two- stage operation. Postoperative patients' satisfaction was evaluated using a visual analogue scale and the reasons of dissatisfaction were analyzed. RESULTS: ONF had poorer outcome than closed nasal bone fracture. Unsatisfactory cosmetic results such as scan of the external nose and change of the skin color were the most common problems associated with open nasal reduction. CONCLUSION: Operation timing and technique should be selectively applied to different types of nasal bone fracture and wound state. Meticulous wound care as well as accurate nasal bone reduction is mandatory for ONF.
