Surgical Outcome of a Zero-profile Device Comparing with Stand-alone Cage and Anterior Cervical Plate with Iliac Bone Graft in the Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion.
10.14245/kjs.2014.11.3.169
- Author:
Jae Sik SHIN
1
;
Sung Han OH
;
Pyoung Goo CHO
Author Information
1. Department of Neurosurgery, Bundang Jesaeng General Hospital, Sungnam, Korea. swalme@hanmail.net
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
Cervical vertebrae;
Dysphagia;
Kyphosis;
Pain;
Postoperative complication
- MeSH:
Cervical Vertebrae;
Deglutition Disorders;
Diskectomy*;
Female;
Follow-Up Studies;
Humans;
Incidence;
Kyphosis;
Postoperative Complications;
Retrospective Studies;
Transplants*
- From:Korean Journal of Spine
2014;11(3):169-177
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
-
Abstract:
OBJECTIVE: A Zero-profile device is a cervical stand-alone cage with integrated segmental fixation device. We characteristically evaluated the radiological changes as well as clinical outcomes in the application of Zero-profile devices compared with stand-alone cages and anterior cervical plates with iliac bone grafts for the cervical disease. METHODS: Retrospectively, total 60 patients at least more than one year follow-up were enrolled. Twenty patients were treated with Zero-profile devices (Group A), twenty patients with stand-alone cages (Group B) and twenty patients with anterior cervical plates and iliac bone grafts (Group C) for a single level cervical disease. The clinical outcomes were evaluated by Odom's criteria and Bazaz-Yoo dysphagia index. The radiologic parameters were by subsidence and the changes of the midpoint interbody height (IBH), the segmental kyphotic angle (SKA), the overall kyphotic angle (OKA) in index level. RESULTS: Although there was no significant clinical difference according to the Odom's criteria among them(p=0.766), post-operative dysphagia was significantly decreased in the Group A and B compared with the Group C (p=0.04). From the immediate postoperative to the last follow-up time, the mean change of IBH decrement and SKA increment were significant in the Group B compared with the Group A (p=0.025, p=0.033) and the Group C (p=0.001, p=0.000). The subsidence rate was not significant among all groups (p=0.338). CONCLUSION: This Zero-profile device is a valuable alternative to the anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with a low incidence of postoperative dysphagia and without segmental kyphotic change.
