Accuracy of Percutaneous Lumbosacral Pedicle Screw Placement Using the Oblique Fluoroscopic View Based on Computed Tomography Evaluations.
10.4184/asj.2016.10.4.630
- Author:
Go YOSHIDA
1
;
Koji SATO
;
Tokumi KANEMURA
;
Toshiki IWASE
;
Daisuke TOGAWA
;
Yukihiro MATSUYAMA
Author Information
1. Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Hamamatsu Medical Center, Hamamatsu, Japan. goy@K6.dion.ne.jp
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
Minimally invasive;
Pedicle screw fixation;
Percutaneous;
Accuracy;
Oblique view
- MeSH:
Fluoroscopy;
Humans;
Pedicle Screws*;
Radiation Exposure;
Retrospective Studies;
Spinal Fusion;
Spine
- From:Asian Spine Journal
2016;10(4):630-638
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
-
Abstract:
STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective. PURPOSE: This study aims to investigate the accuracy of the oblique fluoroscopic view, based on preoperative computed tomography (CT) images for accurate placement of lumbosacral percutaneous pedicle screws (PPS). OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE: Although PPS misplacement has been reported as one of the main complications in minimally invasive spine surgery, there is no comparative data on the misplacement rate among different fluoroscopic techniques, or comparing such techniques with open procedures. METHODS: We retrospectively selected 230 consecutive patients who underwent posterior spinal fusion with a pedicle screw construct for degenerative lumbar disease, and divided them into 3 groups, those who had undergone: minimally invasive percutaneous procedure using biplane (lateral and anterior-posterior views using a single C-arm) fluoroscope views (group M-1), minimally invasive percutaneous procedure using the oblique fluoroscopic view based on preoperative CT (group M-2), and conventional open procedure using a lateral fluoroscopic view (group O: controls). The relative position of the screw to the pedicle was graded for the pedicle breach as no breach, <2 mm, 2–4 mm, or >4 mm. Inaccuracy was calculated and assessed according to the spinal level, direction and neurological deficit. Inter-group radiation exposure was estimated using fluoroscopy time. RESULTS: Inaccuracy involved an incline toward L5, causing medial or lateral perforation of pedicles in group M-1, but it was distributed relatively equally throughout multiple levels in groups M-2 and controls. The mean fluoroscopy time/case ranged from 1.6 to 3.9 minutes. CONCLUSIONS: Minimally invasive lumbosacral PPS placement using the conventional fluoroscopic technique carries an increased risk of inaccurate screw placement and resultant neurological deficits, compared with that of the open procedure. Inaccuracy tended to be distributed between medial and lateral perforations of the L5 pedicle, as a result of pedicle morphology and the PPS pathway. Oblique fluoroscopic views, based on CT measurement, may allow accurate PPS insertion with a shorter fluoroscopy time.
