Decreasing Pattern in Perinatal Mortality Rates in Korea: In Comparison with OECD Nations.
- Author:
Dong Hoon HAN
1
;
Kyung Suk LEE
;
Sung Hoon CHUNG
;
Yong Sung CHOI
;
Won Ho HAHN
;
Ji Young CHANG
;
Chong Woo BAE
Author Information
1. Department of Pediatrics, Kyung Hee University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. baecw@khnmc.or.kr
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
Public health;
Epidemiological methods;
Vital statistics;
Perinatal mortality;
Perinatal mortality rate
- MeSH:
Epidemiologic Methods;
Korea;
Perinatal Care;
Perinatal Mortality;
Public Health;
Vital Statistics
- From:Korean Journal of Perinatology
2011;22(3):209-220
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:Korean
-
Abstract:
PURPOSE: In Korea before 1996, the perinatal mortality rates (PMRs) were reported by individual studies, but the Korea Ministry of Health and Welfare started official reports of PMRs from 1996, and Statistics Korea provides the annual official data since 2007. The present study observed the decreasing trends of PMR and compared the PMRs between OECD nations. Thereby, we surveyed the terminology of PMR and the international trends in the usage of the calculation methods and intended to provide uniformity in calculating PMR in Korea. Also, the authors speculated some perinatal problems to be improved in the future in order to decrease PMR further. METHODS: Data before 1996 were gathered from individual reports, and after 1996 were utilized from Ministry of Health and Welfare, and Statistics Korea. Data of OECD nations were analyzed from OECD Health Data 2010. The changes in annual PMR of Korea was reviewed, which is helpful to recognize the current state of Korea, and was compared to that of OECD nations. RESULTS: During the past 50 years, the PMRs of Korea were remarkably improved (PMRs: 60 in 1960s, 35 in 1970s, 30 in 1980s, approximately, respectively). The official PMR values of Korea are as following: 6.0 in 1996, 5.2 in 1999, 4.6 in 2002, 4.2 in 2005, 3.6 in 2006, 3.7 in 2007, 3.6 in 2008, and 3.4 in 2009. The decreasing pattern of the annual PMR value was observed and the most recent value reflected the excellent situation in PMR compared to other OECD nations. CONCLUSION: Accordingly, we could observe the encouraging levels of PMR in Korea. We speculate that following efforts should be accompanied to achieve further improvement in PMR, such as improvements in neonatal and maternity transfer system, establishment in perinatal care centers, and establishment in perinatal research network system in Korea.
