Early Assessment of Cost-effectiveness of Gastric Electrical Stimulation for Diabetic Nausea and Vomiting.
- Author:
Mette W KLINGE
1
;
Peter RASK
;
Lene S MORTENSEN
;
Kathrine LASSEN
;
Niels EJSKJAER
;
Lars H EHLERS
;
Klaus KROGH
Author Information
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords: Diabetes mellitus; Electrical stimulation; Health care costs; Nausea; Vomiting
- MeSH: Diabetes Complications; Diabetes Mellitus; Electric Stimulation*; Follow-Up Studies; Health Care Costs; Hospital Records; Humans; Mortality; Nausea*; Prospective Studies; Quality of Life; Quality-Adjusted Life Years; Surveys and Questionnaires; Vomiting*
- From:Journal of Neurogastroenterology and Motility 2017;23(4):541-549
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
- Abstract: BACKGROUND/AIMS: Recurrent nausea and/or vomiting are common complications of diabetes mellitus. The conditions severely impact the quality of life of patients and often cause repeated admissions to hospital incurring significant healthcare costs. If standard treatment fails, gastric electrical stimulation (GES) may be offered in selected cases, as a minimally invasive, but expensive, therapeutic option. Our aims are to evaluate the clinical effect and the cost-utility of GES as a treatment for severe diabetic recurrent nausea and/or vomiting. METHODS: Among 33 diabetes patients implanted with GES because of recurrent nausea and/or vomiting, 30 were available for evaluation. The effect of treatment was assessed prospectively using symptom-diaries and the SF-36 questionnaires at baseline, after 6 and 12 months, and thereafter yearly. The number of days in hospital due to symptoms related to gastrointestinal dysfunction was calculated using hospital records 12 months prior to and 12 months after implantation. RESULTS: The surgical procedures were performed without mortality or major complications. Six months after surgery 78% of the respondents had at least 50% reduction in time with nausea and 48% had at least 50% reduction in days with vomiting. Symptom relief persisted at follow-up after at least 4 years. Quality adjusted life years improved after GES, which was cost-effective after 24 months. CONCLUSIONS: GES reduces symptoms and improves quality of life in diabetes patients with recurrent nausea and/or vomiting. The procedure is supposed as cost-effective over a 2-year time horizon.
