Assessment of quantitative structure-activity relationship of toxicity prediction models for Korean chemical substance control legislation.
- Author:
Kwang Yon KIM
1
;
Seong Eun SHIN
;
Kyoung Tai NO
Author Information
- Publication Type:Legislation ; Original Article
- Keywords: Applicability; Assessment; Act on the Registration, Evaluation, Authorization, and Restriction of Chemical Substances; Quantitative structure-activity relationships; Validity
- MeSH: Humans; Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship*; Reproducibility of Results; Social Control, Formal
- From:Environmental Health and Toxicology 2015;30(Suppl):s2015007-
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
- Abstract: OBJECTIVES: For successful adoption of legislation controlling registration and assessment of chemical substances, it is important to obtain sufficient toxicological experimental evidence and other related information. It is also essential to obtain a sufficient number of predicted risk and toxicity results. Particularly, methods used in predicting toxicities of chemical substances during acquisition of required data, ultimately become an economic method for future dealings with new substances. Although the need for such methods is gradually increasing, the-required information about reliability and applicability range has not been systematically provided. METHODS: There are various representative environmental and human toxicity models based on quantitative structure-activity relationships (QSAR). Here, we secured the 10 representative QSAR-based prediction models and its information that can make predictions about substances that are expected to be regulated. We used models that predict and confirm usability of the information expected to be collected and submitted according to the legislation. After collecting and evaluating each predictive model and relevant data, we prepared methods quantifying the scientific validity and reliability, which are essential conditions for using predictive models. RESULTS: We calculated predicted values for the models. Furthermore, we deduced and compared adequacies of the models using the Alternative non-testing method assessed for Registration, Evaluation, Authorization, and Restriction of Chemicals Substances scoring system, and deduced the applicability domains for each model. Additionally, we calculated and compared inclusion rates of substances expected to be regulated, to confirm the applicability. CONCLUSIONS: We evaluated and compared the data, adequacy, and applicability of our selected QSAR-based toxicity prediction models, and included them in a database. Based on this data, we aimed to construct a system that can be used with predicted toxicity results. Furthermore, by presenting the suitability of individual predicted results, we aimed to provide a foundation that could be used in actual assessments and regulations.
