Unexposed Ampullary Cancer.
- Author:
Eui Ryun PARK
1
;
Dong Ki LEE
;
Jun Myeong KIM
;
Soon Koo BAIK
;
Kwang Yong SHIM
;
Phil Ho JEONG
;
Do Yeun CHO
;
Sang Ok KWON
Author Information
1. Department of Internal Medicine, Wonju College of Medicine, Yonsei University, Wonju, Korea.
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
Unexposed ampullary cancer;
Endoscopic sphincterotomy
- MeSH:
Alkaline Phosphatase;
Bile;
Bilirubin;
Biopsy;
Cholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic Retrograde;
Diagnosis;
Dilatation;
Duodenum;
Humans;
Jaundice;
Mucous Membrane;
Prognosis;
Sphincterotomy, Endoscopic;
Surgical Instruments;
Ulcer
- From:Korean Journal of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
1997;17(3):362-368
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:Korean
-
Abstract:
BACKGROUND: Ampullary cancer is a malignant lesion in the pancreatobiliary system with a relatively good prognosis because of its slow growth, early appearance of symptoms and high resectability. Hndoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreaticography(ERCP) is an important and useful method in the diagnosis of ampullary cancer because it identifies the location of lesions endoseopically and by opacification of the bilio-pancreatic ducts and allows confirmation by biopsy, But the diagnostic accuracy of endoscopic forcep biopsy was variable according to the macroscopic appearance of ampullary cancer. In unexposed type ampullary cancer, biopsy after endoscopic sphincterotomy or intraluminal cannulatian biopsy has been recommended because the cancer tissue was either not visible at all or barely visible from the lumen of the duodenum. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the contribution of endoscopic sphincterotomy to the diagnosis of ampullary cancer and to compare the clinical eharasteristics of unexposed type ampullary cancer with those of exposed type ampullary cancer. METHOD: Thirty-one cases of the ampullary cancers over the past 5 years were reviewed. Macroscopically, thirty one ampullary cancers were classified into two types. The unexposed type ampullary cancer was defined normal ampullary mucosa with or without protruding. The exposed type ampullary cancer was defined abnormal ampullary mucosa including nodular, ulcerative, nodulo-ulcerative and polypoid appearance. Ampullary cancers were diagnosed preoperatively by forcep biopsy, biopsy after endoscopic sphincterotomy, or brushing cytology. RESULT: The proportion of unexposed type in ampullary cancer was 29%(9 cases). There were no differences of age, sex, diagnostic clue, distal common bile duct(CBD) shape and CBD dilatation by ERCP between unexposed and exposed type ampullary cancers. The serum bilirubin, alkaline phosphatase and GGT were lower in unexposed type comparting with exposed type. The unexposed ampullary cancers could be diagnosed with biopsy after endoscopic sphincterotomy except one case. Biopsy samples were successfully obtained immediately after sphincterotomy in 3 patients and a few days (3 days later-1 month later) after sphincterotomy in 5 patients. CONCLUSION: Weconsider the possibility of unexposed ampullary cancer in cases of jaundice or duct dilatation with normal ampullary cancer in cases of jaundice or duct dilatation with normal ampulla mucosa and should perform biopsy after endoscopic sphincterotomy.
