A Meta-Analysis of Explanatory Variables of Health Promotion Behavior.
10.4040/jkan.2000.30.4.836
- Author:
Young Joo PARK
1
;
Sook Ja LEE
;
Eun Sook PARK
;
Ho Shin RYU
;
Jae Won LEE
;
Sung Ok CHANG
Author Information
1. Professor, College of Nursing, Korea University, Korea.
- Publication Type:Meta-Analysis ; Original Article
- Keywords:
Health promoting behavior;
Meta-analysis
- MeSH:
Adult;
Child;
Child Health;
Health Promotion*;
Humans;
Internal-External Control;
Nursing;
Quality of Life;
Sample Size;
Societies, Nursing;
Women's Health
- From:
Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing
2000;30(4):836-846
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:Korean
-
Abstract:
This Meta-Analysis of 18 studies was conducted to determine the magnitude of th relationship between health promotion behavior and each of explanatory variables. The studies were measured using Health Promoting Life Style(HPLP) developed by Walker and others based on Pender's definiton of health promoting behavior. The sample was collected by searching for The Journal of Korean Academy Nursing Society, The Journal of Korean Women's Health Nursing Academic Society,The Journal of Korean Academic Society of Adult Nursing, Journal of Korean Community Nursing, The Journal of Fundamentals of Nursing, The Journal of Korean Nursing Administration Academic Society, The Korean Journal of Child Health Nursing, The Journal of Korean Psychiatric Academic Society, the dissertations for mater degree or doctoral dissertations for the period from 1980 to 1998. The explanatory variables measured more than 2 times in studies were self-efficacy, perceived health status, self-esteem, internal, powerful- others and chance dimensions of health locus of control, perceived benefits, hardiness, wellbeing and clinical demensions of health concepts, and quality of life(life satisfaction). Effect sizes were calculated by unweighted mean r, weighted mean r by sample size and weighted mean r by quality index score after homogeneity test. The mean r effect size indicator range of each predictor variable were as follows; quality of life (0.50- 0.52), self-efficacy(0.46-0.47), hardiness (0.42-0.44), self-esteem(0.41-0.43), health locus of control- internal(0.32-0.34), health locus of control- powerful others (0.25-0.31), perceived health status(0.18-0.19) and clinical dimensions of health concepts (0.16-0.17).
