Effect Of Anchorage Systems On Load Transfer With Mandibular Implant Overdentures: A Three-Dimensional Photoelastic Stress Analysis.
- Author:
Jin Yeol KIM
1
;
Young Chan JEON
;
Chang Mo JEONG
Author Information
1. Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, Pusan National University. jeonyc@hanmir.com
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
Anchorage system;
Photoelastic stress analysis;
Mandibular implant overdenture
- MeSH:
Denture, Overlay*;
Friction;
Humans;
Models, Theoretical;
Molar;
Osseointegration;
Prostheses and Implants
- From:The Journal of Korean Academy of Prosthodontics
2002;40(5):507-524
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:Korean
-
Abstract:
Load transfer of implant overdenture varies depending on anchorage systems that are the design of the superstructure and substructure and the choice of attachment. Overload by using improper anchorage system not only will cause fracture of the framework or screw but also may cause failure of osseointegration. Choosing anchorage system in making prosthesis, therefore, can be considered to be one of the most important factors that affect long-term success of implant treatment. In this study, in order to determine the effect of anchorage systems on load transfer in mandibular implant overdenture in which 4 implants were placed in the interforaminal region, patterns of stress distribution in implant supporting bone in case of unilateral vertical loading on mandibular left first molar were compared each other according to various types of anchorage system using three-dimensional photoelastic stress analysis. The five photoelastic overdenture models utilizing Hader bar without cantilever using clips(type 1), cantilevered Hader bar using clips(type 2), cantilevered Hader bar with milled surface using clips(type 3), cantilevered milled-bar using swivel-latchs and frictional pins(type 4), and Hader bar using clip and ERA attachments(type 5), and one cantilevered fixed-detachable prosthesis(type 6) model as control were fabricated. The following conclusions were drawn within the limitations of this study. 1. In all experimental models, the highest stress was concentrated on the most distal implant supporting bone on loaded side. 2. Maximum fringe orders on ipsilateral distal implant supporting bone in a ascending order is as follows; type 5, type 1, type 4, type 2 and type 3, and type 6. 3. Regardless of anchorage systems, more or less stresses were generated on the residual ridge under distal extension base of all overdenture models. To summarize the above mentioned results, in case of the patients with unfavorable biomechanical conditions such as not sufficient number of supporting implants, short length of the implant and unfavorable antero-posterior spread,selecting resilient type attachment or minimizing distal cantilever bar is considered to be appropriate methods to prevent overloading on implants by reducing cantilever effect and gaining more support from the distal residual ridge.
