Outcomes of Ultrasound-Guided Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy for Painful Stump Neuroma.
10.5535/arm.2014.38.4.523
- Author:
Yun Jae JUNG
1
;
Won Yong PARK
;
Jong Hyun JEON
;
Jeong Hyeon MUN
;
Yoon Soo CHO
;
Ah Young JUN
;
Ki Un JANG
;
Cheong Hoon SEO
Author Information
1. Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Dongtan Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University College of Medicine, Hwaseong, Korea.
- Publication Type:Original Article ; Randomized Controlled Trial
- Keywords:
Amputation stumps;
Neuroma;
Extracorporeal shock wave therapy;
Ultrasonography;
Visual analogue scale
- MeSH:
Amputation;
Amputation Stumps;
Humans;
Neuroma*;
Pain Measurement;
Shock*;
Transcutaneous Electric Nerve Stimulation;
Ultrasonography;
Visual Analog Scale
- From:Annals of Rehabilitation Medicine
2014;38(4):523-533
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
-
Abstract:
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) on painful stump neuroma. METHODS: Thirty patients with stump neuroma at the distal end of an amputation site were assigned randomly to the ESWT group (n=15) and the transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS)+desensitization+pharmacological treatment group (n=15). For 3 weeks, the ESWT group received a weekly session involving 1,500 pulses at 0.10 mJ/mm2, while the control group was treated 10 times each, 40 minutes per day with TENS and desensitization treatment, and daily medication for 3 weeks. ESWT stimulation was given by focusing on the area at the neuroma site clearly identified by ultrasound. RESULTS: The changes in the McGill pain questionnaire were 38.8+/-9.0 prior to treatment and 11.8+/-3.1 following the treatment. The corresponding values for the control group were 37.2+/-7.7 and 28.5+/-10.3. The changes between groups were significantly different (p=0.035). The change in visual analog scale prior to and after treatment was 7.0+/-1.5 and 2.8+/-0.8 in the ESWT group, respectively, and 7.2+/-1.4 and 5.8+/-2.0 in the control group. These changes between the groups were also significantly different (p=0.010). The outcome in the pain rating scale also showed significant differences between groups (p<0.001). Changes in neuroma size and pain pressure threshold (lb/cm2) were not significantly different between groups (p>0.05). CONCLUSION: The study findings imply that ESWT for stump neuroma is superior to conventional therapy.
