Evaluation of Different Methods of Gastroenterostomy after Distal Gastrectomy for Gastric Carcinoma.
10.5230/jkgca.2009.9.4.215
- Author:
Eun Hye CHOI
1
;
Jong Myeong LEE
Author Information
1. Department of Surgery, The Presbyterian Medical Center, Jeonju, Korea. gslee52@hanafos.com
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
Gastric carcinoma;
Billroth II gastroenterostomy;
Braun enteroenterostomy;
Roux-en-Y gastroenterostomy;
Reflux esophagitis
- MeSH:
Body Weight;
Endoscopy;
Esophagitis, Peptic;
Gastrectomy;
Gastric Stump;
Gastritis;
Gastroenterostomy;
Hemoglobins;
Hospital Records;
Humans;
Postoperative Complications;
Surveys and Questionnaires;
Stomach Neoplasms
- From:Journal of the Korean Gastric Cancer Association
2009;9(4):215-222
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:Korean
-
Abstract:
PURPOSE: Billroth II gastroenterostomy is a typical reconstruction method after distal gastrectomy for gastric carcinoma, but it has problems, especially frequent reflux esophagitis. Various methods have been tried to address this problem. Among them are Braun enteroenterostomy and Roux-en-Y gastroenterostomy, which are performed separately according to the size of the gastric remnant. The aim of our study was to determine whether these applications are compatible. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between September 2003 and April 2007, we performed Roux-en-Y gastroenterostomy operations (14 patients) when the size of the gastric remnant was <10%, Braun enteroenterostomy (17 patients) when the size was between 10 and 20%, and Billroth II gastroenterostomy (14 patients) when the size was between 20 and 40% after subtotal gastrectomy for gastric cancer by a single surgeon at our hospital. We analyzed the results of each treatment. We evaluated the symptoms and endoscopic findings using questionnaires and hospital records. To evaluate nutritional states, we reviewed albumin and hemoglobin levels and body weight changes. RESULTS: All operations were performed safely mortality was 0% and postoperative complications were 8.9%. On endoscopy, reflux gastritis was observed to occur in 7.63%, 18.65% and 40.0%, respectively, of patients who had undergone Roux-en-Y, Braun and Billroth II operations (P=0.13). Reflux esophagitis was observed in 1 patient in the Roux-en-Y group and 1 patient in the Braun group. Endoscopic gastrostasis was observed in 2 patients in the Roux-en-Y group, one of which was thought to cause reflux esophagitis. Patients in the Roux-en-Y group and Braun groups ingested a lower volume of food than did those in the Billroth II group (respectively, 7.1%, 0.0% and 28.7%) and complained less of postprandial discomforts (respectively, 14.3%, 23.5% and 57.1%) and reflux symptoms (respectively 0.0%, 11.8% and 42.9%). CONCLUSION: The application of Braun enteroenterostomy and Roux-en-Y gastroenterostomy to the small gastric remnant may be effective for reducing reflux symptoms and abdominal discomfort after distal gastric resection. We recommend Roux-en-Y gastroenterostomy when the size of the gastric remnant is <10%, and Braun anastomosis in the others. It will need to be determined which reconstructive procedure is better for many different conditions.
