Psychometric properties of a novel knowledge assessment tool of mechanical ventilation for emergency medicine residents in the northeastern United States.
- Author:
Jeremy B RICHARDS
1
;
Tania D STROUT
;
Todd A SEIGEL
;
Susan R WILCOX
Author Information
- Publication Type:Multicenter Study ; Original Article
- Keywords: Emergency medicine; Prospective studies; Psychometrics; Reproducibility of results; United States
- MeSH: Discrimination (Psychology); Emergencies*; Emergency Medicine*; New England*; Prospective Studies; Psychometrics*; Reproducibility of Results; Respiration, Artificial*; United States
- From:Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions 2016;13(1):10-
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
- Abstract: PURPOSE: Prior descriptions of the psychometric properties of validated knowledge assessment tools designed to determine Emergency medicine (EM) residents understanding of physiologic and clinical concepts related to mechanical ventilation are lacking. In this setting, we have performed this study to describe the psychometric and performance properties of a novel knowledge assessment tool that measures EM residents' knowledge of topics in mechanical ventilation. METHODS: Results from a multicenter, prospective, survey study involving 219 EM residents from 8 academic hospitals in northeastern United States were analyzed to quantify reliability, item difficulty, and item discrimination of each of the 9 questions included in the knowledge assessment tool for 3 weeks, beginning in January 2013. RESULTS: The response rate for residents completing the knowledge assessment tool was 68.6% (214 out of 312 EM residents). Reliability was assessed by both Cronbach's alpha coefficient (0.6293) and the Spearman-Brown coefficient (0.6437). Item difficulty ranged from 0.39 to 0.96, with a mean item difficulty of 0.75 for all 9 questions. Uncorrected item discrimination values ranged from 0.111 to 0.556. Corrected item-total correlations were determined by removing the question being assessed from analysis, resulting in a range of item discrimination from 0.139 to 0.498. CONCLUSION: Reliability, item difficulty and item discrimination were within satisfactory ranges in this study, demonstrating acceptable psychometric properties of this knowledge assessment tool. This assessment indicates that this knowledge assessment tool is sufficiently rigorous for use in future research studies or for assessment of EM residents for evaluative purposes.
