Radiologic and Histopathologic Evaluation of Various Contrast Media for Bronchography.
10.3348/jkrs.1999.41.5.915
- Author:
Eun Young KANG
1
;
Ki Taek HONG
;
Jin Hyung KIM
;
Hyung Rae KIM
;
Bong Kyung SHIN
;
Yu Whan OH
;
Han Kyeom KIM
;
Cheol Min PARK
;
Hae Young SEOL
;
In Ho CHA
Author Information
1. Department of Diagnostic Radiology, College of Medicine, Korea University, Korea. keyrad@ns.kumc.or.kr
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
Bronchography;
Lung, drug effects;
Contrast media;
Contrast, media, effects;
Contrast media, experimental studies
- MeSH:
Barium;
Bronchography*;
Consensus;
Contrast Media*;
Diatrizoate Meglumine;
Edema;
Estrogens, Conjugated (USP);
Hemorrhage;
Ioxaglic Acid;
Lung;
Necrosis;
Pneumonia;
Rabbits
- From:Journal of the Korean Radiological Society
1999;41(5):915-922
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:Korean
-
Abstract:
PURPOSE: To determine which contrast media are both efficient and safe for the imaging of airways. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We evaluated five contrast media (barium, gastrografin, iotrolan, ioxaglate, iopentol) in terms of image quality and their effects on the lungs of 25 white rabbits. For bronchography 0.5ml of contrast media was used. In each contrast group, HRCT scans were obtained immediately (n=5), 12 hours (n=4), 1 day (n=3), 2 days (n=2), and 1 week (n=1) after bronchography. Histopathologic specimens were obtained immediately, 12 hours, 1 day, 2 days, and 1 week later. Bronchograms were evaluated for image quality by three radiologists working independently, and were scored as 1(poor), 2(moderate), or 3(good) in terms of contrast quality and bronchial coating. HRCT was evaluated by two radiologists who reached a concensus; they determined the presence of contrast media, and then the pattern and extent of pulmonary opacity, and any related changes. Histopatholgic specimens were evaluated by two pathologists who sought consensus as to the extent of inflammation, pulmonary edema, and hemorrhage, and any changes in these aspects. RESULTS: Bronchography indicated that the sum of scores for contrast quality was 45 for barium, 33 for gastrografin, 28 for iotrolan, 30 for ioxaglate, and 28 for iopentol, while for each of these media, the sum of scores for bronchial coating was 39, 19, 25, 23, and 21, respectively. Barium showed the best image quality. In all rabbits, HRCT demonstrated the variable extent of groundglass attenuation and/or consolidation. Lesions were most extensive at 1-2 days and then regressed at 1 week; these HRCT findings correlated well with histologic findings. In histologic studies of all five contrast media groups, variable severe inflammatory reactions were observed, with or without necrosis, congestion, edema, and hemorrhage. It was noted that ioxaglate appeared to cause least tissue reaction. CONCLUSIONS: The imaging results of this experimental study indicate that for bronchography, barium is the best available contrast media, On the basis of the histologic and HRCT results, however, ioxaglate is the best.
