Early Results of SPARC (Suprapubic Arc) Procedures for the Female Patients with Stress Urinary Incontinence.
- Author:
Kyu Hung HAN
1
;
Jung Man CHO
;
Hyun Jung PARK
;
Jeong Yoon KANG
;
Jeong Yun JEONG
;
Tag Keun YOO
Author Information
1. Department of Urology, Eulji University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. kjy5205@eulji.or.kr
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
Urinary incontinence;
Stress;
Polypropylene;
Bladder
- MeSH:
Anesthesia, Spinal;
Female*;
Follow-Up Studies;
Humans;
Length of Stay;
Physical Examination;
Polypropylenes;
Postoperative Complications;
Propofol;
Urinary Bladder;
Urinary Incontinence*;
Urodynamics
- From:Journal of the Korean Continence Society
2004;8(2):130-133
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:Korean
-
Abstract:
PURPOSE: The Suprapubic Arc (SPARC) procedure has recently been introduced as a new surgical treatment option for stress urinary incontinence in women. We have reported our early results of SPARC procedures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 23 patients received SPARC procedures at our hospital between November 2002 and August 2003. All the patients were evaluated with history taking, physical examination, urodynamic study and cystography preoperatively. The procedure was carried out under IV propofol or spinal anesthesia. The enrolled patients were followed-up for more than 3 months postoperatively. The cure rate was evaluated and perioperative and postoperative complications were assessed. RESULTS: The mean age of the patients was 48.8 years (ranges from 32 to 67 years) and eight patients had past history of previous abdominal or pelvic surgery. The mean hospital stay was 1.9 days (ranges from 1 to 7 days). Mean follow-up period was 7.9 months (ranges from 3.7 to 14.0 months). Nineteen of the 23 patients (82.6%) were completely cured and 2 patients (8.7%) were much improved, hence the total success rate of the procedure was 91.3%. Bladder perforation during procedure occurred in 7 patients (30.4%) but conservative management sufficed. No serious complication was occurred. CONCLUSION: Our early results show that the SPARC procedure is a effective treatment option for the management of stress urinary incontinence. But we suggest that surgeons should be careful to avoid the bladder injury especially in their early period of experience.
