Is There Any Age Cutoff to Treat Elderly Patients with Head and Neck Cancer? Comparing with Septuagenarians and Octogenarians.
10.3346/jkms.2016.31.8.1300
- Author:
Heejin KIM
1
;
Seong Dong KIM
;
Ye Ji SHIM
;
Sang Yeon LEE
;
Myung Whun SUNG
;
Kwang Hyun KIM
;
J Hun HAH
Author Information
1. Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Hallym University, Dongtan Sacred Heart Hospital, Hwaseong, Korea.
- Publication Type:Comparative Study ; Original Article
- Keywords:
Head and Neck Neoplasms;
Geriatric Assessment;
Surgical Procedures, Operative;
Radiation Oncology
- MeSH:
Age Factors;
Aged;
Aged, 80 and over;
Comorbidity;
Head and Neck Neoplasms/mortality/*radiotherapy/*surgery;
Humans;
Retrospective Studies;
Survival Rate;
Treatment Outcome
- From:Journal of Korean Medical Science
2016;31(8):1300-1306
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
-
Abstract:
With the increase in life expectancy, age is no longer considered as a limitation for treatment. Nevertheless, the treatment of elderly patients with head and neck cancer (HNC) remains controversial. Here, we aimed to review our experience with the treatment for elderly patients, while particularly focusing on the differences among older old patients (septuagenarians vs. octogenarians). We retrospectively reviewed the records of 260 elderly patients who were assigned to 3 groups according to age: 70 years old ≤ group 1 < 75 years old, 75 years old ≤ group 2 < 80 years old, and group 3 ≥ 80 years old. The patients were assessed for comorbidities using the Adult Comorbidity Evaluation (ACE)-27, and the American Society of Anesthesia (ASA) physical status was also compared. Group 1, 2, and 3, consisted of 97, 102, and 61 patients, respectively. No significant difference in demographic data was noted among the groups. However, group 3 showed more comorbidities than groups 1 and 2. With regard to the initial treatment for HNC, radiation therapy (RT) was more frequently performed in group 3 than in groups 1 and 2. Among 7 patients of non-compliant to treatment in group 3, 6 patients had have performed RT. In group 3, a total of 18 patients underwent surgery, including microvascular free flap reconstruction and no significant difference in complications was observed postoperatively compared with group 1 and 2. Moreover, no significant difference was noted in overall survival between the groups, regardless of the treatment modality chosen. In conclusion, octogenarians with HNC should be more carefully managed than septuagenarians with HNC. Surgical treatment can be considered in octogenarians with HNC, if it can be tolerated.
