- Author:
Jin PARK
1
;
Joo Ik KIM
;
Han Uk KIM
;
Seok Kweon YUN
;
Seong Jin KIM
Author Information
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords: Alopecia; Asians; Dermoscopy; Koreans
- MeSH: Alopecia; Asian Continental Ancestry Group; Dermoscopy; Diagnosis, Differential; Ethnic Groups; Hair Color; Hair*; Humans; Hyphae; Scalp; Skin
- From:Annals of Dermatology 2015;27(5):539-550
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
- Abstract: BACKGROUND: Trichoscopic findings of hair loss have been well described for the differential diagnosis of alopecia; however, critical findings were not thoroughly investigated or compared among all ethnic groups, including Asians. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to find any characteristic trichoscopic findings in Korean alopecia patients and to verify whether those findings are closely related to previously reported observations. METHODS: Three hundred and twenty-seven patients with hair loss of various causes and 160 normal scalps were analyzed. Trichoscopic examination was performed with a polarized-light handheld dermoscope. RESULTS: A total of 35 patterns of trichoscopic features were represented, and certain features were significantly common or observed exclusively in a particular type of alopecia as follows: yellow dots, exclamation mark hairs, and proximal tapering hairs (alopecia areata), trichoptilosis and pointed hairs (trichotillomania), corkscrew hairs, septate hyphae hairs, and comma hairs (tinea capitis), diffuse white area, fibrotic white dots, and tufting hairs (primary cicatricial alopecia), hair diameter diversity and peripilar sign (androgenetic alopecia), and short nonvellus hairs (telogen effluvium). CONCLUSION: The characteristic trichoscopic features for the differential diagnosis of alopecia in Koreans, shown as follicular, perifollicular, and hair shaft patterns, are similar to those of Caucasians; however, the frequencies of the pigment patterns are different between Koreans and Caucasians because of the contrast effect of the skin and hair color. Therefore, racial difference should be considered in the trichoscopic evaluation for differential diagnosis.