Developmental Direction for Review System of the Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing.
10.4040/jkan.2007.37.3.422
- Author:
Hae Won KIM
1
;
Myungsill CHUNG
;
Jeong Sook PARK
;
Yeon Ok SUH
;
Min Hyun SUK
;
Hyunsook SHIN
;
Jin Hyang YANG
;
Hee Jung JANG
;
Myun Sook JUNG
Author Information
1. Department of Nursing, College of Medicine, Kwandong University, Korea. hwkim@kd.ac.kr
- Publication Type:Original Article ; English Abstract
- Keywords:
Academic;
Evaluation;
Review;
Korean Academy of Nursing
- MeSH:
Adult;
Advisory Committees/standards;
Editorial Policies;
Female;
Humans;
Korea;
Male;
Middle Aged;
*Nursing Research;
*Peer Review, Research;
Periodicals as Topic/*standards
- From:
Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing
2007;37(3):422-430
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:Korean
-
Abstract:
PURPOSE: This study was performed to identify current characteristics of the Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing and to explore a way to elevate it to an international level and to critique the overall review process so as to delineate the advanced, objective paper appraisal in this journal. METHODS: Data was collected using self administered questionnaires to 75 journal reviewers belonging to the Korean academy of nursing and its division academy of nursing from August 15th to September 30th, 2006. RESULTS: The majority of reviewers pointed out a lack of discrimination between the Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing and other journals. Among the main answers of reviewers, Creativeness(52.3%) and excellence of nursing(38%) will be critical factors to develop in order to elevate to an the journal to an international level. In specific evaluation areas, reviewers preferred a subjective critique method(60%), and the condition of the decision making process regarding paper acceptance as a combination of checklist and subjective evaluation(84%). Subjective evaluation opinions with major categories will occur in the next revised evaluation format. 76% of reviewers agreed with the current objective evaluation form. CONCLUSIONS: The journal review process should be evaluated on a regular basis to elevate the journal level and a mutual agreement of the journal's scope, range, and purpose will be necessary. As a recommendation, an attempt at various approaches in journal reviews and reviewer training should be made.
