Value of a Bolus-Tagging Method on Contrast-Enhanced Abdominal MR Angiography.
10.3348/jkrs.1999.41.4.705
- Author:
Mi Ra SEO
1
;
Moon Gyu LEE
;
Hyuk Jin HONG
;
Hyun Kwon HA
;
Pyo Nyun KIM
;
Yong Ho AUH
Author Information
1. Department of Diagnostic Radiology University of Ulsan, Asan Medical Center, Korea.
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
Gadolinium;
Magnetic resonance (MR), contrast enhancement;
Magnetic resonance (MR), vascular studies
- MeSH:
Angiography*;
Arteries;
Gadolinium;
Gadolinium DTPA;
Hand;
Heart Rate;
Humans
- From:Journal of the Korean Radiological Society
1999;41(4):705-711
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:Korean
-
Abstract:
PURPOSE: To assess the value of the bolus-tagging method for improving the image quality of contrast-enhanced MR abdominal angiography, and to evaluate the relationship between peak arterial enhancement time and patients' age, weight and heart rate. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Contrast-enhanced 3D FISP abdominal MR angiography was performed in 81 patients during a four-month period. The bolus-tagging method was used in a study group comprising 33 patients, and to this end, 1 ml of Gd-DTPA (gadolinium-diethylenetriamine penta-acetic acid) was administered. thirty sequential images (1 image/sec) were then obtained using turbo-FLASH sequencing. After determining peak arterial enhancement time from the time-to-signal intensity curve, optimal scan delay time can be calculated according to the formula used in our patient series. The 48 patients in whom the bolus-tagging method was not used comprised the control group ; in the study group scanning commenced at the optimal scan delay time (and at 10 seconds in the control group) after the administration of 0.2 mM/kg Gd-DTPA using an automatic power injector. Using a three-point scale we evaluated and compared between the two groups the success with which arterial images were obtained. In addition, vascular visibility -an indication of the quality of arteries and veins-was determined using a four-point scale. In the study group, the relationship between peak arterial enhancement time and patients' age, weight heart rate was also assessed. RESULTS: Pure arterial images were successfully obtained in 32 patients (97%) in the study group and in 40 (83%) in the control group. This difference was not statistically significant (p>.05). With regard to vascular visibility, diagnostic arterial images were seen in 30 patients (91%) in the study group and in 33 patients (69%) in the control group; arterial visibility was significantly better in the study group (p=.0197). On the other hand, the diagnostic venous images were seen in 31 patients (94%) in the study group and in 36 (75%) in the control group; there was no significant difference between the two groups (p=.2367). Peak arterial enhancement time increased significantly with age (r=.443, p=.0098); no correlation,however was seen between peak arterial enhancement time and weight (p>.05) or heart rate (p>.05). CONCLUSION: Used with contrast-enhanced 3-D FISP MR abdominal angiography, the bolus-tagging method provides better arterial visibility. Peak arterial enhancement time increased significantly with age.
