Impact of the Outpatient Prescription Incentive Program on Reduction of Pharmaceutical Costs of Clinics in South Korea.
10.4332/KJHPA.2017.27.3.247
- Author:
Seong Hee KWON
1
;
Kyu Tae HAN
;
Sohee PARK
;
Ki Tae MOON
;
Eun Cheol PARK
Author Information
1. Department of Health Policy and Management, Yonsei University Graduate School of Public Health, Seoul, Korea.
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
Pharmaceutical expenditures;
Financial incentives;
Health services research;
Separation of prescribing and dispensing
- MeSH:
Cost Savings;
Delivery of Health Care;
Health Expenditures;
Health Policy;
Health Services Research;
Humans;
Korea*;
Motivation*;
National Health Programs;
Outpatients*;
Prescriptions*
- From:Health Policy and Management
2017;27(3):247-255
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
-
Abstract:
BACKGROUND: South Korea has experienced problems with excessive pharmaceutical expenditures. In 2010, the South Korean government introduced an outpatient prescription incentive program to effectively manage pharmaceutical expenditures. Therefore, we examined the relationship between the outpatient prescription incentive program and pharmaceutical expenditures. METHODS: We used data from the Korean National Health Insurance claims database, which included medical claims filed for 22,732 clinics from 2011–2014 to evaluate associated pharmaceutical expenditures. We performed multiple regression analysis and Poisson regression analysis using generalized estimating equation models to examine the associations between outpatient prescription incentives and the outcome variables. RESULTS: The data used in this study consisted of 123,392 cases from 22,372 clinics (average 5.4 periods follow-up). Clinics that had received outpatient prescription incentives in the last period had better cost saving and Outpatient Prescribing Costliness Index (OPCI) (received: proportion of cost saving, β=6.8179; p-value <0.0001; OPCI, β=−0.0227; p-value <0.0001; reference=non-received). Moreover, these clinics had higher risk in the provision of outpatient prescription incentive (relative risk, 2.772; 95% confidence interval, 2.720 to 2.824). The associations were higher in clinics that had separate prescribing and dispensing programs, or had professional staff. CONCLUSION: The introduction of an outpatient prescription incentive program for clinics effectively managed problems with rapid increases of pharmaceutical expenditures in South Korea. However, the pharmaceutical expenditures still increased in spite of the positive impact of the outpatient prescription incentive program. Therefore, healthcare professionals and health policy makers should develop more effective alternatives (i.e., for clinics without separate prescribing and dispensing programs) based on our results.
