Efficacy of Diagnostic Laparoscopy for TFTC (Transcervical Fallopian Tube Catheterization) in Tubal Infertility Patients.
- Author:
Chan Woo PARK
1
;
Hye Ok KIM
;
Kuol HUR
;
Kwang Moon YANG
;
Jin Young KIM
;
In Ok SONG
;
Keun Jae YOO
;
Jong Young JUN
;
Kyung Sang LEE
;
Inn Soo KANG
;
Mi Kyoung KOONG
Author Information
1. Division of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Samsung Cheil Hospital and Women's Healthcare Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
Diagnostic laparoscopy;
Selective saipingography;
Tubal catheterization
- MeSH:
Catheterization;
Catheters;
Fallopian Tube Diseases;
Fallopian Tubes*;
Female;
Humans;
Hysterosalpingography;
Infertility*;
Laparoscopy*;
Pathology;
Pregnancy Rate;
Reproductive Techniques, Assisted;
Retrospective Studies
- From:Korean Journal of Fertility and Sterility
2003;30(2):141-150
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:Korean
-
Abstract:
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether diagnostic laparoscopy before transcervical fallopian tube catheterization (TFTC) would improve tubal recanalization rate and pregnancy rate in patients with bilateral proximal tubal blockage in hysterosalpingogram (HSG). METHODS: The retrospective study was performed in those underwent TFTC from January 1998 to December 2001. A total of 50 patients with bilateral proximal tubal blockage in HSG were subjected to TFTC sequentially using repeated HSG (rHSG), selective salpingography (SS) followed by tubal catheterization (TFTC). Each procedure was terminated once patency had been achieved without proceding to the next technique. In Group A patients (n=35, 64 tubes), diagnostic laparoscopy was performed before TFTC was taken to exclude the tube combined with peritubal adhesion or distal tubal pathology. In Group B, patients (n=15, 26 tubes) were performed TFTC without diagnostic laparoscopy. RESULTS: There were significant difference in clinical pregnancy rate (45.7% vs 15.4%, p=0.034) but no differences were found in recanalization rate (75.0% vs 73.1%) and complication rate (8.6% vs 13.3%). Although there is no signficant difference, more tubes were canalized by SS, which means tubal obstruction rather than occlusion, in Group A (25.0% vs 5.3%, p=0.069). CONCLUSION: Diagnostic laparoscopy would be effective in the selection of tube for the relatively inexpensive and less invasive TFTC or patients in need of assisted reproductive technologies. With the tubes without combined peritubal adhesion or distal tubal pathology, pregnancy rate was significantly increased.
